Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ANIL TUKARAM MOHITEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

A bail application voluntarily withdrawn by the applicant is to be disposed of without further consideration.

Summary

Anil Tukaram Mohite filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Tanmay Kate, subsequently requested that the bail application be withdrawn unconditionally. The State, represented by Ms. Shilpa G. Talhar and counsel for the complainant, opposed the bail but did not contest the withdrawal. The Court considered the request and, noting that the applicant had voluntarily withdrawn the application, disposed of it without addressing the merits. Consequently, no order on bail was made.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the applicant

Subjects

  • bail
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • high court
  • application disposal

Judgment

                                                                                           20.BA.2051.2026.doc

       Ajay

                                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                    CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2051 OF 2026

                                 Anil Tukaram Mohite                                  .. Applicant
                                       Versus
                                 State of Maharashtra                                 .. Respondent

                                                          ....................
                                  Mr. Tanmay Kate, Advocate for Applicant.
                                  Mr. Sachin Ramrao Pawar a/w. Mr. Varad Shinde, Advocates for
                                   complainant.
                                  Ms. Shilpa G. Talhar, APP for Respondent – State.
                                  Mr. Sachin Patil, API Swargate Police Station, Pune present.
                                                              ......…...........

                                                             CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                                             DATE         : AUGUST 25, 2026.

                                 P.C.:

                                 1.        Heard Mr. Kate, learned Advocate for Applicant; Mr. Pawar,

                                 learned Advocate for complainant and Ms. Talhar, learned APP for

                                 Respondent – State.


                                 2.        In view of the reasons stated in the praecipe and at the

                                 request of Mr. Kate, learned Advocate for Applicant seeks to withdraw

                                 the present Bail Application unconditionally.


                                 3.        In view of the above, Bail Application is disposed as

                                 withdrawn.


                                                                               [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]

       Ajay
              Digitally signed
              by AJAY
AJAY       TRAMBAK
TRAMBAK    UGALMUGALE
UGALMUGALE Date: 2026.08.25
              20:29:42 +0530

                                                                                                       1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.