Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

VINOD SHESHRAO SURWASEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The bail application is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh application if there is no substantive progress in the trial after six months.

Summary

Vinod Sheshrao Surwase applied for criminal bail before the Bombay High Court. The State of Maharashtra, through its counsel, informed the court that eleven witnesses had been examined. The court permitted the applicant to withdraw the bail application, granting him liberty to file a fresh application if the trial does not make substantive progress within six months. The withdrawal was ordered on the basis that there was no substantive progress in the trial. All other pending applications in the matter were disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether the bail application may be withdrawn by the applicant
  • Whether the applicant may be granted liberty to file a fresh bail application if the trial does not progress within six months

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • withdrawal of application
  • trial delay

Judgment

                                                                                                23-BA-2311-2025.doc



                             N.S.Kamble


                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                            CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                          CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2311 OF 2025


                             Vinod Sheshrao Surwase                                         … Applicant
                                   Versus
                             The State of Maharashtra                                       … Respondent
          Digitally signed
NILAM     by NILAM
SANTOSH
          SANTOSH
          KAMBLE
                             ____________________________________________________________
KAMBLE    Date: 2026.02.18
          15:23:10 +0530
                             Mr.Prathamesh Naik, for the Applicant.
                             Ms.R.D. Humane, APP for Respondent-State.
                             Mr.Lalit More, PSI, Wakad Police Station.
                             ____________________________________________________________
                                                                CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                                DATE           :     17th FEBRUARY 2026

                             P.C. :

                             .             Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and learned APP.
                             2.            The learned APP, on instructions, submit that 11 witnesses have
                             been examined.        Considering the statement of the learned APP, the
                             Applicant is permitted to withdraw this Application with liberty to file fresh
                             Application, if there is no substantive progress in the trial after six months.
                             3.            Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the
                             Applicant, the Application is allowed to be withdrawn with the aforesaid
                             liberty.
                             4.            All pending Applications are disposed of.



                                                                                   (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)


                                                                 Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.