Bombay High Court
RUSHIKESH BALASAHEB JODHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Allowed
Holding
Bail is granted to the applicant subject to the conditions imposed by the Court.
Summary
The Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by a 19‑year‑old college student accused of causing a fatal road accident while allegedly intoxicated. The applicant was charged under Sections 105, 125(b), 281 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and several provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The defence argued lack of mens rea, absence of pre‑meditation and the dark, unlit road conditions. The Court, emphasizing the applicant’s youth and the reformative purpose of bail, held that continued incarceration could be more harmful than beneficial. Accordingly, bail was granted subject to a personal bond, sureties, reporting requirements, and other conditions, with the order disposed.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to a young accused charged with culpable homicide and motor vehicle offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Motor Vehicles Act despite alleged intoxication.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 483
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 105, 125(b), 281
- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 146, 181, 184, 185, 196, 3(1)
Subjects
- bail
- young offender
- intoxication
- culpable homicide
- reformative justice
- motor vehicle accident
- Section 483
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
- Motor Vehicles Act
Judgment
94. BA-2547-26.odt
Amberkar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2547 OF 2026
Rushikesh Balasaheb Jodh .. Applicant
Versus
State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
....................
Mr. R.J. Nirmal i/by R.R. Kale, Advocates for Applicant
Ms. Rajeshree V. Newton, APP for State
...................
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
DATE : OCTOBER 7, 2026
P. C.:
1. Heard Mr. Nirmal, learned Advocate for Applicant and Ms.
Newton, learned APP for State.
2. This is an Application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik
Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking Bail in connection with C.R. No.
04/2026 registered with Dighi Sagri Police Station, Raigad for the
offences punishable under Sections 105, 125(b), 281 of the Bharatiya
Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short "BNS") and Sections 184, 185, 146,
196, 3(1) / 181 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
3. Applicant before me is a young offender, 19 years of age,
studying in college in the first year Bachelor of Arts stream. On
31.01.2026, he along with his friends was traveling in a Swift car
belonging to one of his friends who was traveling along with him.
Case of the prosecution is that the victim who was riding on his
1 of 6
94. BA-2547-26.odt
motorcycle and proceeding from Shekhadi Diveagar Borli Road was
dashed by the Swift car which was driven by the Applicant.
Further case of the prosecution is that the Applicant was also
intoxicated. None of the other persons who were in the car are
indicted otherwise. Since the dash was fatal, the victim has lost his
life. Applicant is arrested and is incarcerated for the past more than 9
months.
4. Mr. Nirmal would submit that the time of the incident being
23:00 hours in the night be considered by the Court and especially on
the road where there were no streetlights and therefore the benefit of
doubt be given to the Applicant considering the fact that the Applicant
did not have any mens rea and any premeditation to commit the crime
in question. He would also submit that investigation has also pointed
out in that direction that there was no nexus between the Applicant
and the deceased victim either.
5. Though prima facie, as per the prosecution case, it may appear
that the accident in question happened due to the car having been
driven by a young offender who was intoxicated and it may have a
societal impact, I have to consider the case of the Applicant for bail on
overall consideration primarily because the Applicant being a young
offender deserves to be given a semblance of a chance towards a
reformative approach so that he can become a good citizen of society.
2 of 6
94. BA-2547-26.odt
6. Considering Applicant’s age, if he is enlarged on bail Court is
hopeful that his family will undoubtedly do their duty to make every
effort and attempt to reform and aid the Applicant in leading a
reformed life while on bail rather than keep him in prison and expose
him to criminal outlook and life in prison. However on the flip side, if
a chance is given to the Applicant because of his young age by
enlarging him on bail, there is a possibility that he will be remorseful
and repent in retrospect. This is a chance required to be taken by the
Court because punishment has to be believed to be inflicted for a
reformative result rather than being punitive in nature.
7. Undoubtedly the trial will determine the complicity of Applicant
in the offence. While considering Bail Application in such facts, Court
feels that reform and rehabilitation of the under trial accused needs to
be considered especially when age of the accused person is young so
that he gets an opportunity / or is given an opportunity to reform,
rehabilitate and earn his livelihood honorably from the perspective of
social integration. This is a chance which the Court must take
considering the young age of accused person. The age of the Applicant
is very young. If the Applicant is incarcerated in prison further, there is
every possibility that he might lose faith in the institution and society
at large and may tread the path of criminality or would waste his life.
3 of 6
94. BA-2547-26.odt
Incarceration in prison exposes many youth to abuse as is shown
statistically.
8. There are several harms of incarceration which are inflicted
disproportionately on the youth. This is the reason why Court feels
that any / every semblance of a chance towards a reformative
approach in punishment should be adopted, especially in the case of
young offenders. Hence every opportunity or to that extent risk should
be constructively taken by the Court in the case of young offenders –
accused before committing such accused to further custody and give
such accused an opportunity to become a good citizen in the Society.
These observations are only in the view of the young age of the
Applicant before me and it is only a means to explore an alternative to
incarceration so that the Applicant can become a good citizen.
9. Applicant is incarcerated for more than months. Hence, in view
of my aforesaid prima facie observations, Bail Application is allowed
subject to the following conditions:-
(i) Applicant is directed to be immediately released on bail
from prison in connection with C.R. No. 4 of 2026;
(ii) Applicant is directed to be released on bail on
furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs. 15,000/- (Rs. Fifteen
Thousand only) with one or two sureties in the like
4 of 6
94. BA-2547-26.odt
amount;
(iii) Applicant shall report to the Investigating Officer at
Dighi Sagri Police Station, once every month on the
first Sunday of the month between 10:00 a.m. to 12:00
p.m.;
(iv) Applicant shall co-operate with the conduct of trial and
attend the Trial Court on all dates, unless specifically
exempted and will not take any unnecessary
adjournments, if he does so it will entitle the
prosecution to apply for revocation of this order;
(v) Applicant shall not leave the State of Maharashtra
without prior permission of the Trial Court;
(vi) Applicant shall not influence any of the witnesses or
tamper with the evidence in any manner;
(vii) Applicant shall keep the Investigating Officer informed
of his current address and mobile contact number and /
or change of residence or mobile details, if any, from
time to time, as applicable; and
(viii)Any infraction of the conditions shall entail cancellation
of bail granted to the Applicant.
5 of 6
94. BA-2547-26.odt
10. Needless to state that the above observations will not
come in the way of trial as they are prima facie in nature based on the
submissions made and the material placed before this Court.
11. Bail Application is allowed and disposed of in the above
terms.
Amberkar [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
Digitally
signed by
RAVINDRA
RAVINDRA MOHAN
MOHAN AMBERKAR
AMBERKAR Date:
2026.10.07
19:41:11
+0530
6 of 6
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.