Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

GANESH MILIND SHIRSATHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Allowed

Holding

Bail is granted to the applicant on the condition of a personal bond and compliance with stipulated conditions.

Summary

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS by Ganesh Milind Shirsath, accused No.5 in a case involving offences under IPC sections 302, 323, 504, 143, 148, 149 and 201. The applicant argued that bail should be granted on the same footing as accused No.2, who had already been released on bail. The Court noted the parity principle and, after prima facie assessment, found no impediment to granting bail. It ordered the applicant’s release on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with sureties and imposed standard conditions such as monthly reporting, non‑tampering with witnesses, and restriction on leaving the state. The order expressly limited its observations to bail and declined to comment on the merits of the underlying criminal charges.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to accused No.5 under Section 483 of the BNSS on the basis of parity with accused No.2 despite the seriousness of the offences.

Legislation cited

  • Bail and Bond Section (BNSS) — s. 483
  • Indian Penal Code — s. 143, 148, 149, 201, 302, 323, 504

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • parity principle
  • IPC offences
  • personal bond
  • conditions of bail

Judgment

                                                                81.BA.2552.2026.doc

Ajay

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                          CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                       BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2552 OF 2026

       Ganesh Milind Shirsath                              .. Applicant
             Versus
       State of Maharashtra                                .. Respondent
                                ....................
        Mr. Akshay Bankapur, Advocate for Applicant
        Mr. Yogesh M. Nakhwa, APP for State
        Mr. Anwar Mulani, PSI, Sarkarwada Police Station, Nashik
                                     ......…...........

                                    CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                    DATE         : SEPTEMBER 22, 2026.

       P.C.:

       1.        Heard Mr. Bankapur, learned Advocate for Applicant and

       Mr. Nakhwa, learned APP for State.


       2.        This is an Application under Section 483 of BNSS seeking

       bail in connection with Crime Register No. 126/2024 dated

       01.05.2024 registered with Sarkarwada Police Station, Nashik for the

       offences punishable under Sections 302, 323, 504, 143, 148, 149 and

       201 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.


       3.        The role of the Applicant arrayed as accused No. 5 in the

       present crime is identical to that of accused No. 2. By order dated

       01.09.2026, accused No. 2 has been enlarged on bail by discussing the

       incident in paragraph number 3 thereof. In that view of the matter, on

       parity, the Applicant has made out a case for grant of bail.

                                                                            1 of 3
                                                         81.BA.2552.2026.doc




4.       Hence, in view of above prima facie observations and

findings, Bail Application of Applicant is allowed subject to the

following terms and conditions:-


         (i)   Applicant is directed to be immediately released on bail

               from prison in connection with C.R. No. 126/2024;


         (ii) Applicant is directed to be released on bail on

               furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five

               Thousand only) with one or two sureties in the like

               amount;


         (iii) Applicant shall report to the Investigating Officer at

               Sarkarwada Police Station, Nashik once every month,

               on the first Monday of the month between 10:00 a.m.

               to 12:00 p.m. until commencement of trial and

               thereafter shall attend all dates of hearing before the

               Trial Court;


         (iv) Applicant shall cooperate with the conduct of the trial

               and remain present before the Trial Court on all dates,

               unless specifically exempted. Applicant shall not seek

               unnecessary adjournments. Any such conduct shall

               entitle the prosecution to apply for cancellation of bail;



                                                                     2 of 3
                                                                                81.BA.2552.2026.doc


                                 (v) Applicant shall not leave the State of Maharashtra

                                      without prior permission of the Trial Court;


                                 (vi) Applicant shall not influence any of the witnesses or

                                      tamper with the evidence in any manner;


                                 (vii) Applicant shall keep the Investigating Officer informed

                                      of his current residential address and mobile telephone

                                      number and shall forthwith inform the Investigating

                                      Officer of any change in their residential address or

                                      mobile telephone number, as and when such change

                                      occurs; and


                                 (viii)Any breach or infraction of any of the aforesaid

                                      conditions shall entail cancellation of the bail granted to

                                      the Applicant.


                   5.            It is clarified that the observations made in this order are

                   limited for the purpose of granting bail only and I have not made any

                   observations on merits of the case. The trial shall be adjudicated on

                   the strength of the evidence led and strictly on its own merits being

                   uninfluenced with any of the prima facie observations made

                   hereinabove in this order.


                   6.            Bail Application is allowed and disposed in the above terms.


                                                                  [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]


              Digitally signed
AJAY
TRAMBAK
              by AJAY
           TRAMBAK
                                                                                            3 of 3
           UGALMUGALE
UGALMUGALE Date: 2026.09.22
              20:20:12 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.