Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RANJEET RAJKUMAR SHENDKAR AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The bail application is disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary

The applicants, Rajneet Rajkumar Shendkar and another, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. The learned counsel for the applicants, Ms. Ekta Patil on behalf of Mr. Prashant Hagare, appeared before the court. The State of Maharashtra was represented by Ms. Rajeshree V. Newton. The court, after hearing both sides, allowed the bail application to be withdrawn in accordance with the reasons stated in the praecipe and the liberty available to the applicants under law. Consequently, the bail application was disposed of as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate procedure for withdrawing a bail application under criminal law?

Subjects

  • bail
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • High Court
  • application disposed

Judgment

                                                                                     11-ba-2758-26.doc

       Urmila Ingale

                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
         Digitally
         signed by
                                            CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
         URMILA
URMILA   PRAMOD
PRAMOD   INGALE
INGALE   Date:
         2026.08.19
         19:20:36
         +0530
                                      BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2758 OF 2026

                       Rajneet Rajkumar Shendkar and anr.                     .. Applicants
                                  Versus
                       The State of Maharashtra                               .. Respondent

                                                    ....................
                        Ms. Ekta Patil i/b Mr. Prashant Hagare, Advocates for Applicants.
                        Ms. Rajeshree V. Newton, APP for Respondent-State.
                                                    ...................

                                                   CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                                   DATE          : AUGUST 19, 2026
                       P.C.:

                       1.       Heard Ms. Patil, learned Advocate for Applicants and Ms.

                       Newton, learned APP for Respondent.


                       2.       The Bail Application is allowed to be withdrawn in view of

                       the reasons mentioned in the praecipe with the liberty as available to

                       the Applicants in accordance with law.


                       3.       The Bail Application is disposed of as withdrawn.



Urmila Ingale                                                       [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]




                                                                                               1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.