Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RAHUL ASHOK ASWALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Disposed off as Withdrawn

Holding

The bail application was withdrawn and the Court disposed of it.

Summary

Rohit Ashok Aswale filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. The applicant was represented by Ms. Mrunmai K. Rokade, while the State of Maharashtra and a second respondent were represented by Ms. Sangeeta E. Phad and Ms. Keral Mehta respectively. The applicant chose to withdraw the bail application. The Court, after hearing the parties, allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the application. No substantive merits of the bail request were examined.

Subjects

  • bail
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                                                                                    24. BA-3176-2026.odt


    Amberkar

                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                             BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3176 OF 2026

               Rohit Ashok Aswale                               .. Applicant
                          Versus
               The State of Maharashtra & Anr.                  .. Respondents
                                           ....................
                Ms. Mrunmai K. Rokade a/w Mr. Narayan Rokade, Advocates for
                 Applicant
                Ms. Sangeeta E. Phad, APP for State
                Ms. Keral Mehta, Advocate (appointed) for Respondent No. 2
                                                         ...................
                                                        CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                                        DATE          : SEPTEMBER 16, 2026
               P. C.:

               1.        Heard Ms. Rokade, learned Advocate for Applicant; Ms. Phad,

               learned APP for State and Ms. Mehta, learned Advocate (appointed)

               for Respondent No. 2.


               2.        For the reasons stated in the praecipe dated 10.09.2026, present

               Bail Application is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as such.



Amberkar                                                             [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
                          Digitally signed
                          by RAVINDRA
               RAVINDRA MOHAN
                        AMBERKAR
               MOHAN    Date:
               AMBERKAR 2026.09.16
                          20:17:58
                          +0530




                                                                                                  1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.