Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHAHRUKH ARKAS@ADKAS@AKASH KALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Dismissed

Holding

The Court declined to grant bail and allowed the applicant to withdraw the bail application, directing the trial court to expedite the trial.

Summary

The applicant, Shahrukh Arkas, filed bail application No. 3211 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court. The State of Maharashtra opposed the bail. The learned Judge expressed a disinclination to grant bail, finding the circumstances did not warrant release. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Shailesh Kharat, requested that the application be withdrawn so that the trial could proceed without delay. The Court accepted this request and ordered that the bail application be treated as withdrawn and directed the trial court to expedite the trial. Consequently, no bail was granted and the matter was referred back to the trial court for speedy disposal.

Issues considered

  • Whether the applicant is entitled to bail in the pending criminal proceedings

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • trial expeditious disposal
  • high court

Judgment

                                                                                8. BA-3211-26.odt


    Amberkar

                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                         CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                     BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3211 OF 2026

               Shahrukh Arkas @ Adkas @ Akash Kale           .. Applicant
                          Versus
               The State of Maharashtra                      .. Respondent
                                        ....................
                Mr. Shailesh Kharat a/w Mr. Onkar Chaudhari, Advocates for
                  Applicant
                Ms. Shilpa G. Talhar, APP for Respondent - State
                Mr. Tushar Bhor, PSI, Shikrapur Police Station, Pune Rural
                                                 ...................
                                                CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                                DATE          : AUGUST 17, 2026
               P. C.:

               1.        Heard Mr. Kharat, learned Advocate for Applicant and Ms.

               Talhar, learned APP for Respondent - State.


               2.        After expressing my disinclination to grant bail to the Applicant,

               Mr. Kharat would persuade the Court to allow the Applicant to

               withdraw the present Bail Application with direction to the learned

               Trial Court to expedite the trial.               In view thereof, present Bail

               Application is disposed of as withdrawn with direction to learned Trial

               Court to expedite the trial.


Amberkar                                                     [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
                        Digitally
                        signed by
                        RAVINDRA
               RAVINDRA MOHAN
               MOHAN    AMBERKAR
               AMBERKAR Date:
                        2026.08.17
                        20:42:12
                        +0530




                                                                                          1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.