Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SAAD MUSA PATELversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Allowed To be withdrawn

Holding

The bail application was disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary

Saad Musa Patel applied for bail before the Bombay High Court in a criminal matter. The Court expressed reluctance to grant bail owing to the seriousness of the alleged offence. Counsel for the applicant then requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The Court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the bail application as withdrawn. No order on bail was pronounced.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate decision on the bail application given the severity of the alleged offence?

Subjects

  • bail
  • withdrawal of application
  • criminal procedure
  • high court
  • severity of offence

Judgment

                                                                                         10. BA-3215-26.odt


    Amberkar

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                             BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3215 OF 2026

               Saad Musa Patel                                                     .. Applicant
                          Versus
               State of Maharashtra & Anr.                                         .. Respondents
                                         ....................
                Mr. Amit Icham, Advocate for Applicant
                Ms. Sangeeta E. Phad, APP for Respondent No. 1 - State
                Mr. Bharat Shinde, Advocate for Respondent No. 2
                Mr. M.D. Shirke, PSI, Kharghar Police Station, Navi Mumbai
                                                         ...................
                                                        CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                                        DATE          : AUGUST 17, 2026
               P. C.:

               1.        Heard Mr. Icham, learned Advocate for Applicant; Ms. Phad,

               learned APP for Respondent No. 1 - State and Mr. Shinde, learned

               Advocate for Respondent No. 2.


               2.        After this Court expressed its disinclination to grant bail to the

               Applicant in view of the severity of offence, Mr. Icham, learned

               Advocate for Applicant would persuade the Court to allow the

               Applicant to withdraw the present Bail Application. In view thereof,

               Bail Application is disposed of as withdrawn.



Amberkar                  Digitally signed
                          by RAVINDRA
                                                                     [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
               RAVINDRA MOHAN
                        AMBERKAR
               MOHAN    Date:
               AMBERKAR 2026.08.17
                          20:43:00
                          +0530




                                                                                                    1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.