Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RAJ MOHAN SHETTYversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The bail application was disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary

The applicant, Raj Mohan Shetty, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. The court initially expressed a disinclination to grant bail. Counsel for the applicant, Mr. Sagar Joshi, requested time to take further instructions and indicated an intention to withdraw the application while preserving the applicant’s right to re‑apply. The State’s counsel, Ms. Rajeshree V. Newton, opposed bail. The court accepted the withdrawal and disposed of the bail application as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the applicant

Subjects

  • bail
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                                                                                         18. BA-3235-26.odt


    Amberkar

                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                             BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3235 OF 2026

               Raj Mohan Shetty                                                    .. Applicant
                          Versus
               State of Maharashtra                                                .. Respondent
                                          ....................
                Mr. Sagar Joshi, Advocate for Applicant
                Ms. Rajeshree V. Netwon, APP for State
                B.S. Ware, PSI, Dighi Police Station, Pune
                                                         ...................
                                                        CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                                        DATE          : AUGUST 18, 2026
               P. C.:

               1.       Heard Mr. Joshi, learned Advocate for Applicant and Ms.

               Newton, learned APP for State.


               2.       After this Court expressed disinclination to grant bail to the

               Applicant, Mr. Joshi persuades the Court to keep the matter back for

               taking instructions and after taking instructions, he would inform the

               Court that he has instructions to withdraw the present Application

               with liberty to the Applicant to approach this Court as available to him

               in accordance with law. Needless to state that such liberty is reserved

               to the Applicant in accordance with law.


               3.       Bail Application is disposed of as withdrawn.



Amberkar                                                             [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]

                          Digitally signed
               RAVINDRA   by RAVINDRA
               MOHAN
                          MOHAN
                          AMBERKAR
                                                                                                    1 of 1
               AMBERKAR   Date: 2026.08.19
                          11:26:21 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.