Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SAGAR MITHILESH SAROJversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Allowed To be withdrawn

Holding

The bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The applicant, Sagar Mithilesh Saroj, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. The learned counsel for the applicant expressed a desire to withdraw the bail application and sought leave to file a different appropriate application. The Court, after noting its disinclination to entertain the bail application, granted leave to withdraw it. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed as withdrawn. The matter was disposed without any substantive consideration of bail merits.

Subjects

  • bail
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                                                                                         51.BA.3246.2026.doc

     Ajay

                                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                  CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                               BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3246 OF 2026

                               Sagar Mithilesh Saroj                                .. Applicant
                                     Versus
                               State of Maharashtra                                 .. Respondent

                                                            ....................
                                Ms. Saloni K. Patil a/w. Mr. Ajay B. Patil and Mr. Vishwajeet M.
                                 Patil, Advocates for Applicant.
                                Mr. Sukanta A. Karmakar, APP for Respondent – State.
                                                            ......…...........

                                                            CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                                            DATE         : SEPTEMBER 10, 2026.

                               P.C.:

                               1.        Heard Ms. Patil, learned Advocate for Applicant and Mr.

                               Karmakar, learned APP for Respondent – State.


                               2.        After expressing my disinclination to entertain the Bail

                               Application, the learned Advocate appearing for the Applicant sought

                               permission to withdraw the Bail Application with leave and liberty to

                               file an appropriate application, as may be available to the Applicant. In

                               view thereof and reserving such leave and liberty, the Bail Application

                               is dismissed as withdrawn.


                               3.        Bail Application is disposed.


                                                                             [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]

     Ajay
            Digitally signed
            by AJAY
AJAY       TRAMBAK
TRAMBAK    UGALMUGALE
UGALMUGALE Date:
            2026.09.10
            20:31:53 +0530


                                                                                                     1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.