Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MOHD. MASUM SAMEED ANSARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Allowed

Holding

The bail application was disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary

Mohd Musum Sameed Ansari filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. The court expressed disinclination to entertain the application, after which the applicant's counsel sought time for instructions. Upon a second hearing, the counsel requested and was permitted to withdraw the bail application. The court granted the applicant liberty to file a fresh bail application in the future as per law. Consequently, the bail application was disposed of as withdrawn.

Subjects

  • bail
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • High Court
  • application disposal

Judgment

                                                               4.BA.3300.2026.doc

Ajay

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                         CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                       BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3300 OF 2026

       Mohd. Musum Sameed Ansari                        .. Applicant
             Versus
       State of Maharashtra                             .. Respondent
                                   ....................
        Mr. Satyavrat Joshi a/w. Mr. Yash Fadtare and Mr. Priyesh More,
          Advocates for Applicant.
        Ms. Sangeeta E. Phad, APP for Respondent – State.
        Mr. Prashant Sahebrao Diwate, Shirur Police Station present.
                                    ......…...........
                                   CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                   DATE      : AUGUST 31, 2026.
       P.C.:
       1.        Heard Mr. Joshi, learned Advocate for Applicant and Ms.

       Phad, learned APP for Respondent – State.


       2.        After this Court expressed its disinclination to the learned

       Advocate appearing on behalf of the Applicant, the learned Advocate

       persuaded the Court to keep the matter back for taking appropriate

       instructions.


       3.        The matter was called out for the second time and the

       learned Advocate for the Applicant persuaded the Court to allow the

       Applicant to withdraw the present Bail Application.


       4.        Needless to state that leave and liberty is granted to the

       Applicant to move a fresh Bail Application in future in accordance with

       law.


                                                                          1 of 2
                                                                                       4.BA.3300.2026.doc


                                     5.   Bail Application is disposed as withdrawn.



                                                                         [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]

        Ajay
               Digitally signed by
AJAY       AJAY TRAMBAK
TRAMBAK    UGALMUGALE
UGALMUGALE Date: 2026.08.31
               20:46:04 +0530




                                                                                                  2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.