Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PRADEEP RAGHUNATH JADHAVversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The court did not grant bail and dismissed the application, allowing the applicant to withdraw and reapply later.

Summary

Pradeep Raghunath Jadhav applied for bail before the Bombay High Court. The learned judge expressed a disinclination to grant bail. The applicant’s counsel, Mr. Kuldeep U. Nikam, persuaded the court to permit the applicant to withdraw the bail application while reserving the liberty to re‑approach the court later in accordance with law. The court accepted this request, dismissed the bail application and granted the applicant leave to file a fresh application if required. No substantive discussion on the merits of bail was made.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the applicant in the pending criminal case.

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • withdrawal of application

Judgment

                                                                              7. BA 3382-2026.doc




                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                         BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3382 OF 2026

                      Pradeep Raghunath Jadhav                                .Applicant

                                   Vs.

                      The State of Maharashtra                                .Respondent

         Digitally
                      Mr. Kuldeep U. Nikam, Advocate, for the Applicant
         signed by

ANAND
         ANAND
         SUDHAKAR
                      Ms. Sangeeta Phad, APP, for the Respondent – State
SUDHAKAR SUDAME
SUDAME   Date:
         2026.09.08
         10:43:04
         +0530                            CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

                                          DATE     : 07.09.2026
                      P. C.

                      1.      Heard Mr. Nikam, learned Advocate for the Applicant and

                      Ms. Phad, learned APP for the State.

                      2.      After I expressed my disinclination to Mr. Nikam in not granting

                      the present Application, Mr. Nikam in his usual fairness persuades the

                      Court to allow the Applicant to withdraw the Application reserving

                      leave and liberty to him to approach this Court later in accordance with

                      law. Reserving that liberty to the Applicant, the Application is

                      dismissed.



                                                                      (MILIND N. JADHAV, J.)



                      Anand                             1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.