Bombay High Court
SACHIN VILAS KAMBLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Allowed
Holding
Bail is granted to the applicant subject to the conditions specified in the order.
Summary
The applicant, Sachin Vilas Kamble, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for alleged offences of criminal breach of trust and cheating under Sections 316(2), 316(5), 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 3 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999. The prosecution alleged that the applicant had taken an investment of Rs.3.57 crore, returned Rs.1.37 crore initially, and later defaulted, leading to a complaint of cheating. The court observed that the matter appeared to be a civil dispute, with the prosecution lacking a prima facie case of cheating, and noted that the investigation was complete with no further custodial interrogation required. Consequently, the court granted bail, imposing a personal bond of Rs.50,000 with sureties and several conditions regarding reporting, residence, and non‑interference with witnesses. The order expressly limited its observations to bail and did not address the merits of the case, which will be tried on its own merits.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in view of the alleged offences of criminal breach of trust and cheating.
- Whether the matter constitutes a civil dispute, thereby affecting the propriety of criminal prosecution and bail.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 483
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 316(2), 316(5), 318(4)
- Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999 — s. 3
Subjects
- bail
- criminal breach of trust
- cheating
- BNSS 2023
- BNS 2023
- Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act
- civil dispute
- pre‑trial detention
Judgment
56.BA.3383.2026.doc
Ajay
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3383 OF 2026
Sachin Vilas Kamble .. Applicant
Versus
State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
....................
Mr. Abdul Kader, Advocate for Applicant.
Ms. Anuja S. Gotad, APP for Respondent – State.
API – Mr. Kanase, EOW Pune City present.
......…........…
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 28, 2026.
P.C.:
1. Heard Mr. Kader, learned Advocate for Applicant and Ms.
Gotad, learned APP for Respondent – State.
2. This is an Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) seeking bail in
connection with C.R.No.468 of 2025 registered with Vimantal Police
Station, District Pune for offences punishable under Sections 316(2),
316(5) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short
‘BNS’) and Section 3 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of
Depositors Act, 1999. The First Information Report is filed on
23.09.2025 and Applicant came to be arrested on 23.09.2025.
1 of 5
56.BA.3383.2026.doc
3. Applicant is indicted in an offence of criminal breach of trust
and cheating. The case of the prosecution stems from the
Complainant's approaching them stating that Applicant has cheated
him and there is an element of criminal breach of trust. Prima facie,
the material which is placed on record shows that there was a
relationship between the parties whereby Complainant entrusted his
investment to the Applicant for investing in the share market and it is
also seen that for the first few months, the Complainant received
handsome returns. It is only when the returns dried up that the present
case of cheating and criminal breach of trust has been filed.
Investigation has been completed. All disclosures have been made,
prima facie element of cheating is not made out against the
prosecution in view of the fact that it is the Complainant's own case
that he had received amounts for the first few months on the
investments made by him.
4. It is prima facie seen from the record that even as per the
prosecution case, out of the total outlay of the amount of Rs.3.57
crores, an amount in excess of Rs.1.37 crores has been received by the
Complainant and this itself enures to the benefit of Applicant before
me.
5. The dispute, in my opinion therefore would be a civil dispute
and criminal prosecution cannot be invoked. However, the aspect of
2 of 5
56.BA.3383.2026.doc
cheating can be proved by the prosecution at trial. Applicant is arrested
and in jail for almost 1 year, investigation has been completed and no
further custodial interrogation is required. Charges have been framed
and stage of trial is set. In that view of the matter, I am inclined to
accept the case of Applicant for grant of bail.
6. Hence, in view of above prima facie observations and
findings, Bail Application of Applicant is allowed subject to the
following terms and conditions:-
(i) Applicant – Sachin Vilas Kamble is directed to be
immediately released from prison in connection with
CR. No.648 of 2025;
(ii) Applicant is directed to be released on bail on
furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand
only) with one or two sureties in the like amount;
(iii) Applicant shall report to the Investigating Officer at
Vimantal Police Station, once every month, on the first
Sunday of the month between 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
until commencement of trial and thereafter shall attend
all dates of hearing before the Trial Court;
(iv) Applicant shall cooperate with the conduct of the trial
and remain present before the Trial Court on all dates,
3 of 5
56.BA.3383.2026.doc
unless specifically exempted. Applicant shall not seek
unnecessary adjournments. Any such conduct shall
entitle the prosecution to apply for cancellation of bail;
(v) Applicant shall not leave the State of Maharashtra
without prior permission of the Trial Court;
(vi) Applicant shall not influence any of the witnesses or
tamper with the evidence in any manner;
(vii) Applicant shall keep the Investigating Officer informed
of his current residential address and mobile telephone
number and shall forthwith inform the Investigating
Officer of any change in his residential address or
mobile telephone number, as and when such change
occurs; and
(viii)Any breach or infraction of any of the aforesaid
conditions shall entail cancellation of the bail granted to
the Applicant.
7. It is clarified that the observations made in this order are
limited for the purpose of granting bail only and I have not made any
observations on merits of the case. The trial shall be adjudicated on
the strength of the evidence led and strictly on its own merits being
uninfluenced with any of the prima facie observations made
4 of 5
56.BA.3383.2026.doc
hereinabove in this order.
8. Bail Application is allowed and disposed in the above terms.
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
Ajay
Digitally
signed by AJAY
TRAMBAK
AJAY UGALMUGALE
TRAMBAK
UGALMUGALE Date:
2026.09.28
20:28:29
+0530
5 of 5
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.