Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

NITIN VASANT JADHAVversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Allowed

Holding

The court granted bail to the applicant subject to specified conditions.

Summary

The High Court considered an application for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, filed by Nitin Vasant Jadhav, who is charged with causing a fatal road accident under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The prosecution alleged that the applicant was driving a motorcycle under the influence of alcohol and at high speed, but no medical or other tests were presented to substantiate intoxication. The applicant had been in custody for one and a half months and is employed as a welder, indicating his availability for trial. The court, noting the lack of concrete evidence of intoxication and the applicant's ties to the community, granted bail subject to a cash bond and several conditions, including regular reporting to the police and non‑interference with witnesses. The order expressly limited its observations to bail and did not address the merits of the case, which will be decided at trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in view of the allegations of intoxication and fatal accident.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • traffic accident
  • intoxication
  • Section 483 BNSS
  • Motor Vehicles Act
  • court discretion

Judgment

                                                              28.BA.3400.2026.doc

Ajay

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                         CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                       BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3400 OF 2026

       Nitin Vasant Jadhav                               .. Applicant
             Versus
       State of Maharashtra                              .. Respondent

                                   ....................
        Mr. Piyush R. Toshnival, Advocate for Applicant.
        Ms. Sangeeta E. Phad, APP for Respondent – State.
                                   ......…...........

                                  CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                  DATE         : SEPTEMBER 09, 2026.

       P.C.:

       1.        Heard Mr. Toshnival, learned Advocate for Applicant and

       Ms. Phad, learned APP for Respondent – State.


       2.        This is an Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya

       Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) seeking regular bail

       in connection with C.R.No.671 of 2026 registered with Shirur Police

       Station, District Pune for the offences punishable under Sections 281,

       125(a)(m), 125(b), 106(1), 324(4) and 105 of the Bharatiya Nyaya

       Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNS’) and Sections 184 and 185 of the Motor

       Vehicles Act, 1988.


       3.        Applicant was indicted in a crime for committing an

       accident, ultimately committing a fatal accident where the deceased

       lost his life. Case of the prosecution is that Applicant was driving a


                                                                          1 of 4
                                                         28.BA.3400.2026.doc


motorcycle and dashed the deceased from behind who was taking an

evening walk at the side of the road. Prima facie, the prosecution case

states that Applicant was under the influence of liquor, but that has not

been proven despite the investigation having been completed. Neither

the medical test or any other test as required was undertaken by the

prosecution agency to prove intoxication. Neither it is the case of the

prosecution that Applicant was driving his motorcycle at a breakneck

speed causing the accident.

4.        Applicant is incarcerated since 20.07.2026 for over a period

of 1 and half months. Applicant is working in Mitsubishi Company as

a welder at Shirur, Pune. Needless to state that availability of Applicant

at the time of trial is assured by the learned Advocate. Considering the

material placed before me, Applicant is released on bail.

5.        Hence, in view of above prima facie observations and

findings, Bail Application of Applicant is allowed subject to the

following terms and conditions:-

          (i)   Applicant –    Nitin Vasant Jadhav is directed to be

                immediately released from prison in connection with

                CR. No.671 of 2026;

          (ii) Applicant is directed to be released on bail on

                furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five

                Thousand only) with one or two sureties in the like

                amount;

                                                                     2 of 4
                                               28.BA.3400.2026.doc


(iii) Applicant shall report to the Investigating Officer at

     Shirur Police Station, once every month, on the first

     Monday of the month between 10:00 a.m. to 12:00

     p.m. until commencement of trial and thereafter shall

     attend all dates of hearing before the Trial Court;


(iv) Applicant shall cooperate with the conduct of the trial

     and remain present before the Trial Court on all dates,

     unless specifically exempted. Applicant shall not seek

     unnecessary adjournments. Any such conduct shall

     entitle the prosecution to apply for cancellation of bail;


(v) Applicant shall not leave the State of Maharashtra

     without prior permission of the Trial Court;


(vi) Applicant shall not influence any of the witnesses or

     tamper with the evidence in any manner;


(vii) Applicant shall keep the Investigating Officer informed

     of his current residential address and mobile telephone

     number and shall forthwith inform the Investigating

     Officer of any change in his residential address or

     mobile telephone number, as and when such change

     occurs; and




                                                           3 of 4
                                                                                          28.BA.3400.2026.doc


                                           (viii)Any breach or infraction of any of the aforesaid

                                                conditions shall entail cancellation of the bail granted to

                                                the Applicant.


                                 6.        It is clarified that the observations made in this order are

                                 limited for the purpose of granting bail only and I have not made any

                                 observations on merits of the case. The trial shall be adjudicated on

                                 the strength of the evidence led and strictly on its own merits being

                                 uninfluenced with any of the prima facie observations made

                                 hereinabove in this order.


                                 7.        Bail Application is allowed and disposed in the above terms.




                                                                            [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]

       Ajay
              Digitally signed
              by AJAY
AJAY       TRAMBAK
TRAMBAK    UGALMUGALE
UGALMUGALE Date: 2026.09.09
              20:39:24 +0530




                                                                                                      4 of 4


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.