Bombay High Court
SHREEKANT ARJUN GHULEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Allowed
Holding
Bail is granted to the applicant subject to the conditions specified in the order.
Summary
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Shreekant Arjun Ghule, who was arrested for offences including dacoity, murder, and violations of the Arms Act. The applicant argued that co-accused had already been released on bail and that the investigating agency had recovered the entire muddemal, a point confirmed by the prosecution. The court noted the existence of a prima facie case and, without addressing the merits, granted bail subject to stringent conditions such as a cash bond, regular reporting to the police, restrictions on movement, and non‑interference with witnesses. The order emphasized that the bail grant was limited to procedural relief and that the trial would proceed on the evidence presented. Consequently, the bail application was allowed and the applicant was ordered to be released on bail.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 for offences of dacoity, murder and arms violations despite the seriousness of the charges.
- Whether the recovery of the muddemal and the bail of co‑accused establish a prima facie case justifying bail.
Legislation cited
- Arms Act — s. 25, 3
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 483
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 310(2), 49, 62(2)
Subjects
- bail
- Section 483 BNSS
- dacoity
- murder
- Arms Act
- high court
- conditions of bail
- criminal procedure
Judgment
73.BA.3420.2026.doc
Ajay
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3420 OF 2026
Shreekant Arjun Ghule .. Applicant
Versus
State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
....................
Mr. Hrishikesh Mundargi a/w. Mr. Hrishikesh Ghorpade and Paavni
Chadha, Advocates i/by Mr. Siddharth Sutaria for Applicant.
Ms. Sangeeta E. Phad, APP for Respondent – State.
......…........…
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 23, 2026.
P.C.:
1. Heard Mr. Mundargi, learned Advocate for Applicant; Ms.
Phad, learned APP for Respondent – State.
2. This is an Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) seeking bail in
connection with C.R.No.208 of 2026 registered with Baramati Police
Station, District Pune for offences punishable under Sections 310(2),
62(2) and 49 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNS’)
and Sections 3 and 25 of the Arms Act. The First Information Report is
filed on 04.05.2026 and Applicant came to be arrested on 05.05.2026.
3. Learned Advocate for Applicant would inform and apprise
the Court that Accused Nos.3 and 4 have already been enlarged on
bail. Applicant is indicted in a case for dacoity and other allied
1 of 4
73.BA.3420.2026.doc
offences. He would submit that the entire recovery of the muddemal
has been recovered by the investigating agency. The same stands duly
confirmed by the learned Prosecutor, Ms. Phad.
4. In the facts of the matter, on the ground of parity and an
arguable case is made out by the learned Advocate for Applicant for
grant of bail, the Application stands allowed.
5. Hence, in view of above prima facie observations and
findings, Bail Application of Applicant is allowed subject to the
following terms and conditions:-
(i) Applicant – Shreekant Arjun Ghule is directed to be
immediately released from prison in connection with
CR. No.208 of 2026;
(ii) Applicant is directed to be released on bail on
furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand
only) with one or two sureties in the like amount;
(iii) Applicant shall report to the Investigating Officer at
Baramati Taluka Police Station, once every month, on
the first Sunday of the month between 10:00 a.m. to
12:00 p.m. until commencement of trial and thereafter
shall attend all dates of hearing before the Trial Court;
2 of 4
73.BA.3420.2026.doc
(iv) Applicant shall cooperate with the conduct of the trial
and remain present before the Trial Court on all dates,
unless specifically exempted. Applicant shall not seek
unnecessary adjournments. Any such conduct shall
entitle the prosecution to apply for cancellation of bail;
(v) Applicant shall not leave the State of Maharashtra
without prior permission of the Trial Court;
(vi) Applicant shall not enter into the territorial jurisdiction
of Baramati Taluka Police Station and Sangli Police
Station till the conclusion of trial except attending the
Court hearing.
(vii) Applicant shall not influence any of the witnesses or
tamper with the evidence in any manner;
(viii) Applicant shall keep the Investigating Officer informed
of his current residential address and mobile telephone
number and shall forthwith inform the Investigating
Officer of any change in his residential address or
mobile telephone number, as and when such change
occurs; and
(ix) Any breach or infraction of any of the aforesaid
conditions shall entail cancellation of the bail granted to
3 of 4
73.BA.3420.2026.doc
the Applicant.
6. It is clarified that the observations made in this order are
limited for the purpose of granting bail only and I have not made any
observations on merits of the case. The trial shall be adjudicated on
the strength of the evidence led and strictly on its own merits being
uninfluenced with any of the prima facie observations made
hereinabove in this order.
7. Bail Application is allowed and disposed in the above terms.
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
Ajay
Digitally
signed by AJAY
TRAMBAK
AJAY UGALMUGALE
TRAMBAK
UGALMUGALE Date:
2026.09.23
20:49:33
+0530
4 of 4
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.