Bombay High Court
ASHTAR MAXIN SHINDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The court dismissed the bail application as withdrawn, reflecting its disinclination to grant bail.
Summary
The applicant, Ashtar Maxim Shinde, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. The learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Nitin Baban Kamble, argued for the grant of bail. The court, after hearing both sides, expressed a disinclination to allow the bail application. The applicant was permitted to withdraw the application with liberty to re‑approach the court later if required. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether the bail application filed by the accused should be granted.
Subjects
- bail
- criminal procedure
- withdrawal
- high court
- dismissal
Judgment
24.BA.3448.2026.doc
Ajay
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3448 OF 2026
Ashtar Maxim Shinde .. Applicant
Versus
State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
....................
Mr. Nitin Baban Kamble, Advocate for Applicant.
Ms. Sangeeta E. Phad, APP for Respondent – State.
API – Mr. Vaibhav Sonavane, Saswad Police Station, Pune Rural
present.
......…...........
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 21, 2026.
P.C.:
1. Heard Mr. Kamble, learned Advocate for Applicant and Ms.
Phad, learned APP for Respondent – State.
2. After expressing my disinclination to Mr. Kamble for
allowing the present Bail Application, he would submit that Applicant
be allowed to withdraw the Bail Application with leave and liberty to
the Applicant to approach this Court later in accordance with law.
Reserving such leave and liberty to Applicant as available to him in
law, Bail Application is dismissed as withdrawn.
3. Bail Application is dismissed.
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
Ajay
Digitally signed
by AJAY
AJAY
TRAMBAK
TRAMBAK
UGALMUGALE
1 of 1
UGALMUGALE Date: 2026.09.21
18:57:05 +0530
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.