Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SURESH UMAJI MADNEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed off as Withdrawn

Holding

The bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The applicant, Suresh Umaji Madne, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. The learned counsel for the applicant, Ms. Kritika, argued for the grant of bail, while the State's counsel, Mr. Amit A. Palkar, opposed it. After hearing both sides, the Court expressed its disinclination to allow the bail application. The applicant's counsel then requested permission to withdraw the application and to re‑approach the Court later in accordance with law. The Court granted liberty to withdraw and dismissed the bail application as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate decision on the bail application filed by the applicant?

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • withdrawal of application
  • high court

Judgment

                                                                                            6. BA-3460-26.odt


    Amberkar

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                               BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3460 OF 2026

               Suresh Umaji Madne                                                    .. Applicant
                          Versus
               State of Maharashtra                                                  .. Respondent
                                         ....................
                Ms. Kritika a/w Mr. Naagesh Khedkar & Mr. Nagesh Diwaate,
                 Advocates for Applicant
                Mr. Amit A. Palkar, APP for State
                                                           ...................
                                                          CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                                          DATE          : SEPTEMBER 16, 2026
               P. C.:

               1.       Heard Ms. Kritika, learned Advocate for Applicant and Mr.

               Palkar, learned APP for State.


               2.       After this Court After this Court expressed its disinclination to

               allow the present Application, learned Advocate for Applicant

               persuades the Court to allow her to withdraw the present Application

               and to approach the Court later in accordance with law. Reserving the

               said liberty, Application is dismissed as withdrawn.




Amberkar                                                               [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
                            Digitally signed
               RAVINDRA by RAVINDRA
                        MOHAN
               MOHAN    AMBERKAR
               AMBERKAR Date: 2026.09.16
                            20:34:27 +0530




                                                                                                      1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.