Bombay High Court
SAMEER ABDULKALAM SHEKHDAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The court granted bail to the applicant with specified conditions.
Summary
The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a narcotics case (C.R. No. 73 of 2024) where the applicant, Sameer Abdulkalam Shekhdare, was arrested with 1.037 kg of charas and had been in custody for over two years and three months. The trial court had delayed proceedings despite multiple listings, and the applicant argued that the delay, coupled with a violation of Section 52A of the NDPS Act concerning inventory procedures, warranted bail. The court noted the applicant’s clean antecedent record and the applicability of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, which allows for bail where the accused is unlikely to re-offend. After weighing the prima facie observations, the judge granted bail subject to stringent conditions, including a surety bond, regular reporting to the investigating officer, and restrictions on travel and witness tampering. The order expressly limited its observations to bail and did not address the merits of the underlying narcotics charges.
Issues considered
- Whether the applicant is entitled to bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 given the prolonged pre‑trial detention
- Whether the violation of Section 52A of the NDPS Act regarding inventory procedures affects the bail decision
- Whether Section 37 of the NDPS Act permits bail in view of the applicant’s clean antecedents and the risk of re‑offending
Legislation cited
- Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 483
- Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — s. 20(b)(ii)(c), 29, 37, 52A, 8(c)
Subjects
- bail
- NDPS Act
- pre‑trial detention
- Section 52A inventory violation
- Section 37 bail provision
- BNSS 2023
Judgment
15. BA 3472-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3472 OF 2026
Sameer Abdulkalam Shekhdare .Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .Respondent
Digitally
signed by
ANAND
ANAND SUDHAKAR Mr. A. Majid H. Banderkar, Advocate, for the Applicant
SUDHAKAR SUDAME
SUDAME Date:
2026.09.17
Ms. Sangita Phad, APP, for the Respondent – State
12:05:54
+0530
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
DATE : 16.09.2026
P. C.
1. Heard Mr. Banderkar, learned Counsel for the Applicant and Ms.
Phad, learned APP for the Respondent – State.
2. This Application is filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) in connection with
C.R.No. 73 of 2024 registered with Goregaon Police Station for
offences punishable under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(c) & 29 of the
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short
“NDPS”).
3. The Applicant is arraigned as Accused No. 1 in the present crime.
He along with his co-accused were intercepted riding a motor cycle and
apprehended with 1 Kg & 37 Grams of contraband Charas. He was
Anand 1 of 5
15. BA 3472-2026.doc
arrested on 18.05.2024. The co-accused has already been enlarged on
bail by this Court on 10.06.2026. A copy of which is appended at page
No. 199 (Exh.F). The Applicant is in incarceration for the past more
than two years and three months. What is observed in the order of the
learned trial Court while rejecting the bail of the Applicant is that
despite the charge having been framed on 31.01.2026 and the matter
having been listed thereafter on five different occasions, the trial has
been delayed. Though it is attributed to the Accused not stepping into
the box and delaying the trial, the Accused in fact happens to be in
incarceration and in jail and is required to be produced before the
prosecution, if at all the trial has to progress.
4. Learned Advocate has also persuaded me to consider the
violation of the provisions of Section 52A of the NDPS Act which
provides for the procedure for inventories having been violated in the
present case. The Applicant has no antecedents and in that view of the
matter, the benefit of conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act
would have to be considered, as the Applicant is not likely to re-offend
himself and the prolonged custody of the Applicant without the trial
having been progressed persuade the Court to allow the Application of
the Applicant for grant of bail on the ground of long incarceration.
5. Hence, in view of above prima facie observations and finding,
Anand 2 of 5
15. BA 3472-2026.doc
Bail Application of Applicant is allowed subject to the following terms
and conditions:-
(i) Applicant – Sameer Abdulkalam Shekhdare is directed
to be immediately released from prison in connection
with CR. No. 73 of 2024;
(ii) The Applicant is directed to be released on bail on
furnishing P. R. Bond of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty
Thousand only) with one or two sureties in the like
amount;
(iii) The Applicant shall report to the Investigating Officer at
Goregaon Police Station, twice every month, on the first
Monday and third Friday of the month between 10:00
a.m. to 12:00 p.m. until commencement of trial and
thereafter shall attend all dates of hearing before the
Trial Court;
(iv) The Applicant shall co-operate with the conduct of the
trial and remain present before the Trial Court on all
dates, unless specifically exempted. The Applicant shall
not seek unnecessary adjournments. Any such conduct
shall entitle the prosecution to apply for cancellation of
Anand 3 of 5
15. BA 3472-2026.doc
bail;
(v) The Applicant shall not leave the State of Maharashtra
without the prior permission of the Trial Court and he
shall deposit his passport with the Trial Court on his
release;
(vi) The Applicant shall not influence any of the witnesses
or tamper with the evidence in any manner;
(vii) The Applicant shall keep the Investigating Officer
informed of his current residential address and mobile
telephone number and shall forthwith inform the
Investigating Officer of any change in his residential
address or mobile telephone number, as and when such
change occurs;
(viii) The Applicant shall not enter the jurisdiction of the
Goregaon Police Station, till the beginning of the trial
and the village where the victim is staying except for
recording his attendance as directed;
(ix) Any breach or infraction of any of the aforesaid
conditions shall entail cancellation of the bail granted to
the Applicant.
Anand 4 of 5
15. BA 3472-2026.doc
6. It is clarified that the observations made in this order are limited
for the purpose of granting bail only and I have not made any
observations on merits of the case. The trial shall be adjudicated on
the strength of the evidence led and strictly on its own merits being
uninfluenced with any of the prima facie observations made
hereinabove in this order.
7. The Bail Application No. 3472 of 2026 is allowed and disposed
of in the above terms.
(MILIND N. JADHAV, J.)
Anand 5 of 5
Checking your session…