Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RAMU KUNJAL NISADversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The applicant, Ramu Kunjal Nisad, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. The court noted that the applicant had already been convicted, rendering the bail application infructuous. Consequently, the bail application was treated as withdrawn. No further arguments were entertained. The matter was disposed of without granting bail.

Issues considered

  • Bail can be granted to a person who has already been convicted

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • conviction
  • withdrawal

Judgment

                                                                                         37.BA.3502.2026.doc

      HARSHADA H. SAWANT
            (P.A.)
                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                               BAIL APPLICATION NO.3502 OF 2026

                    Ramu Kunjal Nisad                                .. Applicant
                               Versus
                    The State of Maharashtra and Anr.                .. Respondents
                                                ....................
                     Mr. Anil Pandey, Advocate i/by SAVJ Law Solution for Applicant.
                     Mr. Yogesh Nakhwa, APP for Respondent No.1.
                     Ms. Namita Maneshide, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
                     PSI – Nilesh Vitthal Talekar, MIDC Bhosari Police Station.
                                                           ...................

                                                          CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                                          DATE          : SEPTEMBER 28, 2026
                    P.C.:

                    1.            Heard Mr. Pandey, learned Advocate for Applicant; Mr.

                    Nakhwa, learned APP for Respondent No.1 and Ms. Maneshinde,

                    learned Advocate for Respondent No.2.


                    2.            Application has been rendered infructuous because Applicant

                    has been convicted.


                    3.            Bail Application is disposed of as withdrawn.



H. H. SAWANT                                                               [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]

                            Digitally signed
                            by HARSHADA
                   HARSHADA HANUMANT
                   HANUMANT SAWANT
                   SAWANT   Date:
                            2026.09.28
                            15:21:57 +0530




                                                                                                     1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.