Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SANDIP CHHAGAN HOLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Allowed

Holding

Bail is granted to the applicant with conditions under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Summary

The applicant, Sandip Chhagan Hole, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a criminal case (CR No. 0266 of 2026) involving offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including attempt to murder. The incident arose from a communal quarrel at a police station, captured on CCTV, where the applicant allegedly struck persons with his fists. The prosecution alleged his participation in an assault with a motive of murder, among nine accused. The High Court examined whether the applicant’s role and the seriousness of the offences warranted denial of bail. Finding that the applicant had not been shown a distinct role beyond the alleged fist blows and that bail could be conditioned, the Court granted bail with a cash bond and multiple reporting and non‑interference conditions. The bail order was issued, and the application was disposed.

Issues considered

  • What is the applicability of Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for granting bail in offences punishable under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023?
  • Whether the applicant's alleged participation in the assault justifies denial of bail given the seriousness of the charges?
  • Whether imposing specific conditions on bail is appropriate in this case?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • attempt to murder
  • communal violence
  • conditions of bail
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita

Judgment

                                                                          16. BA-3520-26.odt


Amberkar

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                             BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3520 OF 2026

           Sandip Chhagan Hole                                      .. Applicant
                      Versus
           The State of Maharashtra                                 .. Respondent
                                     ....................
            Mr. Prashant Sushant Hagare, Advocate for Applicant
            Mr. Amit A. Palkar, APP for State
            Mr. Vinayak Prakash S., Asst. Police Inspector, Daund Police Station,
             Pune
                                            ...................
                                         CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                         DATE            : SEPTEMBER 21, 2026
           P. C.:

           1.       Heard Mr. Hagare, learned Advocate for Applicant and Mr.

           Palkar, learned APP for State.


           2.       This is an Application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik

           Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking Bail in connection with C.R. No. 0266

           of 2026 registered with Daund Police Station, Taluka Daund, Dist.

           Pune for offences punishable under Sections 109(1), 189(2), 189(4),

           190, 191(2), 191(3) and 192(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.


           3.       The incident in question occurred between two parties in view

           of a quarrel between two communities due to the marriage between

           accused No. 2 and a cousin sister of the first informant. Both the

           families were before the police in the police station premises when the



                                                                                     1 of 3
                                                        16. BA-3520-26.odt


incident occurred under the surveillance of the CCTV cameras of the

police station itself. The verbal altercation which escalated was

attempted to be subsided by the police authorities themselves, but

then it so happened that the issue escalated and an assault took place.


4.    Insofar as the specific role attributed to the Applicant before me

is concerned, it is seen from the record that he has used fists blows to

inflict blows on the persons of the other side. The case of the

prosecution is with regard to causing attempt to murder. There are

total 9 accused persons involved in the present crime. No specific role

except above has been attributed to the present Applicant before me.

Since the motive of the crime is very clear and considering the role of

the Applicant described by the prosecution, Applicant has made out a

case for grant of bail. Hence, Applicant is released on bail on the

following and conditions:-


          (i)   Applicant is directed to be immediately released from

                prison in connection with C.R. No. 0266 of 2026;

          (ii) Applicant is directed to be released on bail on

                furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs. 15,000/- (Rs. Fifteen

                Thousand only) with one or two sureties in the like

                amount;

          (iii) Applicant shall report to the Investigating Officer at

                Daund Police Station, once every month on the first

                                                                   2 of 3
                                                                                    16. BA-3520-26.odt


                                         Sunday of the month between 10:00 a.m. to 12:00

                                         p.m.;

                                 (iv) Applicant shall co-operate with the conduct of trial and

                                         attend the Trial Court on all dates, unless specifically

                                         exempted    and    will     not   take   any   unnecessary

                                         adjournments, if he does so it will entitle the

                                         prosecution to apply for revocation of this order;

                                 (v) Applicant shall not leave the State of Maharashtra

                                         without prior permission of the Trial Court;

                                 (vi) Applicant shall not influence any of the witnesses or

                                         tamper with the evidence in any manner;

                                 (vii) Applicant shall keep the Investigating Officer informed

                                         of his current address and mobile contact number and /

                                         or change of residence or mobile details, if any, from

                                         time to time, as applicable; and

                                 (viii)Any infraction of the conditions shall entail cancellation

                                         of bail granted to the Applicant.

           5.         Needless to state that the above observations will not come in

           the way of trial as they are prima facie in nature based on the

           submissions made and the material placed before this Court.


           6.         Bail Application is allowed and disposed of in the above terms.


Amberkar                                                           [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
                      Digitally signed
                      by RAVINDRA
           RAVINDRA   MOHAN
           MOHAN      AMBERKAR
           AMBERKAR   Date:
                      2026.09.22
                      11:55:48 +0530
                                                                                               3 of 3


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.