Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SATISH BAJIRAO PEKHALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Allowed

Holding

Bail was granted to the applicant subject to specified conditions.

Summary

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Satish Bajirao Pekhale, who was arrested in connection with a murder case (CR No.239 of 2025) and charged under Sections 1103, 109, 3(5) and 238 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 142 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951. The prosecution’s case relied on a witness statement placing the accused at the scene, but the statement attributed the actual assault only to Accused No.1, who had already been released on bail. No weapon or other incriminating material was seized from the applicant. The court applied the principle of parity, noting the lack of direct evidence against the applicant, and therefore found no justification to deny bail. Consequently, the court granted bail subject to a cash bond of Rs.25,000 and a series of reporting and conduct conditions. The order expressly limited its observations to bail considerations, reserving the trial to determine guilt on the merits.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to Accused No.2 under Section 483 of the BNSS given the nature of the allegations and the absence of material evidence against him

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • presumption of innocence
  • witness testimony
  • conditions of bail
  • Indian criminal law
  • BNSS
  • BNS

Judgment

                                                               10.BA.3539.2026.doc

Ajay

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                         CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                      BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3539 OF 2026

       Satish Bajirao Pekhale                             .. Applicant
             Versus
       State of Maharashtra                               .. Respondent
                                   ....................
        Mr. Jinay Jain, Advocate i/by SRK Legal for Applicant.
        Ms. Rajeshree V. Newton, APP for Respondent – State.
        Mr. S.S. Sanap, Nashik Road Police Station present.
                                    ......…...........

                                    CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                    DATE        : SEPTEMBER 22, 2026.

       P.C.:

       1.       Heard Mr. Jain, learned Advocate for Applicant and Ms.

       Newton, learned APP for Respondent – State.


       2.       This is an Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya

       Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) seeking bail in

       connection with C.R.No.239 of 2025 registered with Nashik Road

       Police Station, District Nashik for offences punishable under Section

       1103, 109, 3(5) and 238 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for

       short ‘BNS’) and Section 142 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951. The

       First Information Report is filed on 02.05.2025 and Applicant came to

       be arrested on 19.04.2026.


       3.       Applicant is arraigned as Accused No.2. There are total three

       accused persons. The case of the prosecution is based upon a general

                                                                           1 of 4
                                                        10.BA.3539.2026.doc


allegation that the accused persons have assaulted and allegedly

murdered the deceased victim. Applicant before me is Accused No.2

and he is indicted on the basis of a witness statement, copy of which is

appended at page No.90 which states about the presence of accused at

the scene of crime.


4.        The act of assault, according to the same witness is

attributed only to the Accused No.1 who has already been enlarged on

bail by this Court previously. No weapon or any other incriminating

material has been seized or recovered from the Applicant before me.


5.        In that view of the matter, applying parity to the case of the

Applicant, Applicant is released on bail.


6.        Hence, in view of above prima facie observations and

findings, Bail Application of Applicant is allowed subject to the

following terms and conditions:-

          (i)   Applicant – Satish Bajirao Pekhale is directed to be

                immediately released from prison in connection with

                CR. No.239 of 2025;


          (ii) Applicant is directed to be released on bail on

                furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five

                Thousand only) with one or two sureties in the like

                amount;




                                                                    2 of 4
                                               10.BA.3539.2026.doc


(iii) Applicant shall report to the Investigating Officer at

     Nashik Road Police Station, once every month, on the

     first Sunday of the month between 10:00 a.m. to 12:00

     p.m. until commencement of trial and thereafter shall

     attend all dates of hearing before the Trial Court;


(iv) Applicant shall cooperate with the conduct of the trial

     and remain present before the Trial Court on all dates,

     unless specifically exempted. Applicant shall not seek

     unnecessary adjournments. Any such conduct shall

     entitle the prosecution to apply for cancellation of bail;


(v) Applicant shall not leave the State of Maharashtra

     without prior permission of the Trial Court;


(vi) Applicant shall not influence any of the witnesses or

     tamper with the evidence in any manner;


(vii) Applicant shall keep the Investigating Officer informed

     of his current residential address and mobile telephone

     number and shall forthwith inform the Investigating

     Officer of any change in his residential address or

     mobile telephone number, as and when such change

     occurs; and




                                                           3 of 4
                                                                                       10.BA.3539.2026.doc


                                        (viii)Any breach or infraction of any of the aforesaid

                                             conditions shall entail cancellation of the bail granted to

                                             the Applicant.


                              7.        It is clarified that the observations made in this order are

                              limited for the purpose of granting bail only and I have not made any

                              observations on merits of the case. The trial shall be adjudicated on

                              the strength of the evidence led and strictly on its own merits being

                              uninfluenced with any of the prima facie observations made

                              hereinabove in this order.


                              8.        Bail Application is allowed and disposed in the above terms.




                                                                         [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]

       AjayDigitally signed
             by AJAY
AJAY       TRAMBAK
TRAMBAK    UGALMUGALE
UGALMUGALE Date:
             2026.09.22
             19:42:07 +0530




                                                                                                   4 of 4


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.