Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ADARSH PRASHANT MHATRE @ JAYESH PATILversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Allowed To be withdrawn

Holding

The bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The applicant, Adarsh Prashant Mhatre, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. Counsel for the applicant, Mr. Raviraj Parmane, argued for the grant of bail. The learned judge expressed disinclination to allow the bail and suggested that the applicant could withdraw the application and re‑approach the court later if desired. The applicant was given leave and liberty to withdraw the bail application in accordance with law. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate disposition of the bail application filed by the applicant?

Subjects

  • bail
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                                                                                            11.BA.3540.2026.doc

        Ajay

                                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                     CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                  BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3540 OF 2026

                                  Adarsh Prashant Mhatre @ Jayesh Patil                .. Applicant
                                        Versus
                                  State of Maharashtra                                 .. Respondent

                                                            ....................
                                   Mr. Raviraj Parmane, Advocate for Applicant.
                                   Mr. Sukanta A. Karmakar, APP for Respondent – State.
                                   PSI – Kiran Badip, Chinchwad Police Station present.
                                                               ......…...........

                                                               CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                                               DATE        : SEPTEMBER 22, 2026.

                                  P.C.:

                                  1.        Heard Mr. Parmane, learned Advocate for Applicant and Mr.

                                  Karmakar, learned APP for Respondent – State.


                                  2.        After expressing my disinclination to Mr. Paramane for

                                  allowing the present Bail Application, he would submit that Applicant

                                  be allowed to withdraw the Bail Application with leave and liberty to

                                  the Applicant to approach this Court later in accordance with law.

                                  Reserving such leave and liberty to Applicant as available to him in

                                  law, Bail Application is dismissed as withdrawn.


                                  3.        Bail Application is dismissed.


                                                                                [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]

        Ajay
               Digitally signed
               by AJAY
AJAY       TRAMBAK
TRAMBAK    UGALMUGALE
UGALMUGALE Date: 2026.09.23
               16:14:01 +0530


                                                                                                        1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.