Bombay High Court

RAMHARI JAGANNATH PAWARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposal: Allowed
Bench: VRUSHALI V JOSHI

Holding

The order dated 2 February 2026 stands corrected to reflect the proper name of the police station.

Summary

The Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, heard a bail application where the order dated 2 February 2026 incorrectly mentioned "Sangli Police Station" instead of "Sangli City Police Station." The court corrected this clerical error throughout the document. No substantive legal issues were raised, and the correction did not affect the merits of the bail application. The corrected order was then confirmed. The judgment is limited to the procedural correction of the police station name.

Issues considered

Whether the clerical error in naming the police station in the bail order requires correction.

Subjects

bail
procedural correction
court order
clerk error
high court

Judgment

                                                45-ba-3569-2025 (corrected).doc

           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                     CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                  CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                  BAIL APPLICATION NO.3569 OF 2025
Ramhari Jagannath Pawar        …..Applicant
     Vs.
The State of Maharashtra       …..Respondents

None for the parties.
                               CORAM : MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.
                                 DATED : 20th FEBRUARY 2026
P.C.:-

1.       The Registry has put up the matter for speaking to minutes of

order dated 2nd February 2026.


2.       In the order dated 2nd February 2026 the name of police station

is mentioned as Sangli Police Station instead of Sangli City police

station. The same is corrected wherever it appears.


3.       The order dated 2nd February 2026 stands corrected.




                                  (MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.)




Suresh                                                                       1/1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…