Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

KISHOR SHIVAJIRAO DANGEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The court ordered that the appearance clause be corrected as per the praecipe and disposed of the praecipe.

Summary

The applicant, Dr. Kishor Shivajirao Dange, filed a bail application (No. 3576 of 2026) before the High Court of Bombay. After the initial order dated 17 September 2026, the applicant’s counsel filed a praecipe on 18 September 2026 seeking to replace the list of advocates appearing for the applicant. The court accepted the praecipe and ordered that the appearance clause be corrected to reflect the new roster of counsel. It directed that the corrected order be uploaded while leaving the remainder of the original order unchanged. Finally, the court disposed of the praecipe, thereby effecting the correction.

Issues considered

  • Whether the appearance clause in the bail order can be corrected by a praecipe

Subjects

  • bail
  • procedural order
  • appearance clause
  • praecipe
  • correction of record

Judgment

                                                                       P21. BA-3576-26.odt


Amberkar

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                             BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3576 OF 2026

           Dr. Kishor Shivajirao Dange                       .. Applicant
                       Versus
           The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                   .. Respondents
                                        ....................
            Mr. Dhammaraj Shejul i/by Mr. Subhash Hulyalkar & Mr. Devdas
               Bhagat i/by Hulyalkar & Associates, Advocates for Applicant
                                            ...................
                                           CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                           DATE          : SEPTEMBER 18, 2026
           P. C.:

           1.       Not on board. Mentioned by way of filing a praecipe dated

           18.09.2026 for speaking to the minutes order dated 17.09.2026.


           2.       In view of the praecipe filed, the appearance of Advocates

           appearing for Applicant mentioned in the appearance clause of the

           order dated 17.09.2026 shall stand replaced by the following:-


                    "Mr. Niranjan Mundargi a/w Ms. Keral Mehta, Mr. Subhash P.

                    Hulyalkar, Ms. Pratiksha More, Mr. Devidas Bhagat, Mr.

                    Mithilesh Mishra, Ms. Pooja Khandekar & Ms. Aisha Shaikh i/by

                    Hulyalkar & Associates, Advocates for Applicant"


           3.       Correction to the above effect be carried out in the order dated

           17.09.2026 and corrected order be uploaded. Rest of the said order

           shall remain as it is.



                                                                                    1 of 2
                                                            P21. BA-3576-26.odt


           4.       Praecipe is disposed.


Amberkar                                    [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]

                      Digitally signed
                      by RAVINDRA
           RAVINDRA MOHAN
                    AMBERKAR
           MOHAN    Date:
           AMBERKAR 2026.09.19
                      16:11:56
                      +0530




                                                                         2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.