Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MALAY RAJESH DELIVALAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Allowed To be withdrawn

Holding

The bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Malay Rajesh Delivala applied for bail before the Bombay High Court in a criminal matter against the State of Maharashtra. The respondent's counsel, Mr. Amit A. Palkar, argued that the court should not pass any order on the merits and that the applicant could approach the court later in accordance with law. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Sherali S. Khan and Mr. Tabish Shaikh, expressed a disinclination to allow the application to proceed. Justice Milind N. Jadhav reserved liberty to the applicant to approach the court later and dismissed the bail application as withdrawn. No merits of the bail request were examined. The order effectively closed the present application without prejudice to future filings.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the applicant
  • Whether the bail application can be dismissed as withdrawn

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • withdrawn application
  • High Court
  • disposition

Judgment

                                                                            17. BA 3590-2026.doc




                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                       BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3590 OF 2026

                      Malay Rajesh Delivala                             .Applicant

                                 Vs.
ANAND
SUDHAKAR              The State of Maharashtra                          .Respondent
SUDAME
Digitally signed by
ANAND SUDHAKAR
                      Mr. Sherali S. Khan a/w. Mr. Tabish Shaikh, Advocates, for the
SUDAME
Date: 2026.09.23      Applicant
20:18:14 +0530
                      Mr. Amit A. Palkar, APP, for the Respondent – State

                                          CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

                                          DATE     : 23.09.2026
                      P. C.

                      1.      After expressing my disinclination to allow the present

                      Application, Mr. Khan would persuade the Court not to pass any order

                      on merits and reserve liberty to the Applicant to approach this Court

                      later in accordance with law.

                      2.      Reserving that liberty to the Applicant, the Application stands

                      dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                                     (MILIND N. JADHAV, J.)




                      Anand                             1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.