Bombay High Court
GOVIND SUBHASH NISALversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Allowed
Holding
Bail is granted to the applicant subject to a cash bond and specified conditions.
Summary
The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by Govind Subhash Nisal, who was charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the Arms Act, 1959, and the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951, for unlawful assembly and assault. Eyewitness testimony placed the applicant among the assailants, attributing to him the use of a stone and physical blows. The applicant, a 23‑year‑old married man with a young child and no prior criminal record, argued for release, emphasizing his lack of antecedents and the time already spent in custody. The court evaluated the seriousness of the alleged offences against the applicant’s personal circumstances and the principle of bail. It granted bail subject to a cash bond of Rs. 15,000, sureties, and a series of reporting and conduct conditions, while expressly reserving the right to revoke bail for any breach. The order was limited to bail and did not address the merits of the case.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate exercise of discretion under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in granting bail to an accused charged with unlawful assembly and assault?
- Do the applicant’s personal circumstances (age, marital status, lack of antecedents, prior incarceration) justify bail despite eyewitness identification linking him to the crime?
- Are the conditions imposed by the court sufficient to ensure the applicant’s attendance at trial and prevent tampering with evidence or witnesses?
Legislation cited
- Arms Act, 1959 — s. 25, 4
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 483
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 103(1), 189(2), 189(4), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 324(4), 352
- Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 — s. 135
Subjects
- bail
- unlawful assembly
- assault
- criminal procedure
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
- Arms Act
- Maharashtra Police Act
- conditions of bail
- witness tampering
Judgment
19.BA.3592.2026.doc
HARSHADA H. SAWANT
(P.A.)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.3592 OF 2026
Govind Subhash Nisal .. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
....................
Mr. Aniket Vagal a/w. Ms. Juhi Kadu and Ms. Savvy Kolhekar,
Advocates for Applicant.
Mr. Amit A. Palkar, APP for Respondent.
IO – API – Sudhir Patil and Officer - API – Kalpesh Dabhade,
Mumbai Naka Police Station, Nashik City.
...................
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 23, 2026
P.C.:
1. Heard Mr. Vagal, learned Advocate for Applicant and Mr.
Palkar, learned APP for Respondent.
2. This is an Application under Section 483 of Bharatiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking Bail in connection with C.R.
No.365 of 2024 registered with Mumbai Naka, Nashik City for offences
punishable under Sections 103(1), 189(2), 189(4), 191(2), 191(3),
190, 352 and 324(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023; Sections
4/25 of the Arms Act, 1959 and Section 135 of the Maharashtra Police
Act, 1951.
3. The Applicant in the present crime has been indicted for the
charge of unlawful assembly and assaulting the victim. However the
1 of 4
19.BA.3592.2026.doc
principal protagonist in the present case are all other co-accused
persons. In the First Information Report, Applicant has not been
identified but some 3 – 4 unknown persons alongwith principal
Accused persons were seen to have assaulted the victim. The eye
witness account during the Test-Identification Parade recognises the
presence of Applicant as one of the person. A specific role has been
attributed to the Applicant by the said eye witness to the extent of
Applicant having used a stone to hit the victim. Another eye witness
account however states that the Applicant had inflicted kick and fist
blows on the victim.
4. However, Mr. Vagal would persuade the Court to consider
the issue on the grounds of arrest. Applicant has no antecedents and
he is a young offender of 23 years old, married and having one and
half year old child. Applicant has already suffered incarceration for a
period of 1 year 9 months.
5. Considering the role attributed to Applicant, Applicant is
directed to be released on bail subject to following conditions:-
(i) Applicant is directed to be immediately released from
prison in connection with Crime No. 365 of 2024;
(ii) Applicant is directed to be released on bail on
furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs. 15,000/- (Rs. Fifteen
Thousand only) with one or two surety / sureties of the
2 of 4
19.BA.3592.2026.doc
like amount;
(iii) Applicant shall report to the Investigating Officer at the
concerned Police Station, once every month on the first
Monday of the month between 10:00 a.m. to 12:00
p.m.;
(iv) Applicant shall co-operate with the conduct of trial and
attend the Trial Court on all dates, unless specifically
exempted and will not take any unnecessary
adjournments, if he does so it will entitle the
prosecution to apply for revocation of this order;
(v) Applicant shall not leave the State of Maharashtra
without prior permission of the Trial Court;
(vi) Applicant shall not influence any of the witnesses or
tamper with the evidence in any manner;
(vii) Applicant shall keep the Investigating Officer informed
of his current address and mobile contact number and /
or change of residence or mobile details, if any, from
time to time, as applicable; and
(viii)Any infraction of the conditions shall entail cancellation
of bail granted to the Applicant.
6. It is clarified that the observations made in this order are
limited for the purpose of granting Bail only and I have not made any
observations on merits of the case. The trial shall be adjudicated on
3 of 4
19.BA.3592.2026.doc
the strength of the evidence led and strictly on its own merits being
uninfluenced with any of the prima facie observations made
hereinabove in this order.
7. Bail Application is allowed and disposed of in the above
terms.
H. H. SAWANT [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
Digitally
signed by
HARSHADA
HARSHADA HANUMANT
HANUMANT SAWANT
SAWANT Date:
2026.09.23
19:48:43
+0530
4 of 4
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.