Bombay High Court
UDAY JAYANT JAGTAPversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismissed
Holding
Bail was denied to the applicant as the court found sufficient evidence of his involvement in a grave assault.
Summary
The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Uday Jayant Jagtap, accused No.5 in a violent assault case (C.R. No.45 of 2026). The prosecution alleged that Jagtap, along with two others, brutally attacked the victim with knives, as shown in CCTV footage and the victim's statement, and that the assault was motivated by prior enmity. The applicant argued that another co-accused had been granted bail and that the CCTV did not implicate him, contending the victim was the aggressor. The court examined the material evidence, found the applicant’s role clearly established and the crime heinous, and rejected the parity argument. Consequently, the court dismissed the bail application, denying bail to the applicant.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in view of the seriousness of the alleged assault and the evidence linking him to the crime.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 483
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 109, 189(2), 189(4), 190, 191(1), 191(2), 191(3), 351(3), 352
- Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 — s. 135
Subjects
- bail
- criminal procedure
- assault
- CCTV evidence
- heinous crime
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
- Maharashtra Police Act
Judgment
20.BA.3593.2026.doc
HARSHADA H. SAWANT
(P.A.)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.3593 OF 2026
Uday Jayant Jagtap .. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
....................
Mr. Himanshu S. Gavit a/w. Mr. Yogesh D. Ugale, Advocates for
Applicant.
Mr. Sukanta A. Karmakar, APP for Respondent – State.
...................
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 23, 2026
P.C.:
1. Heard Mr. Gavit, learned Advocate for Applicant and Mr.
Karmakar, learned APP for Respondent.
2. This is an Application under Section 483 of Bharatiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking Bail in connection with C.R.
No.45 of 2026 registered with Adgaon Police Station for offences
punishable under Sections 109, 189(2), 189(4), 190, 191(1), 191(2),
191(3), 351(3), 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section
135 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951.
3. Applicant before the Court is arraigned as Accused No.5 in
the crime. There are total 7 Accused persons in the crime, 3 out of
whom namely Ganesh Salve, Uday Jagtap and Vicky Netawate have
been specifically indicted on the basis of evidence best available with
the prosecution namely the statement of injured victim, copy of which
is appended at page No.162 for having assaulted the victim with knife
1 of 4
20.BA.3593.2026.doc
(chopper).
4. Mr. Gavit would vehemently persuade me to consider the
fact that one of the accused person namely Vikky Netawate has been
already granted bail by Sessions Court, copy of which is appended at
page No.375. I have gone through that order and prima facie I find
that the reason stated in that order to grant bail by Sessions Court to
Vicky Netwate is on the face of record incorrect and contrary to not
only the prosecution case in the First Information Report but also the
statement of the injured victim appended at page No.162.
5. Be that as it may, next submission made by Mr. Gavit is that
no role is attributed or can be seen in the CCTV footage procured by
prosecution qua the present Applicant. There also Mr. Gavit is
completely wrong. The CCTV footage prima facie indicts the three
principal assailants namely Ganesh Salve, Uday Jagtap and Vicky
Netawate having grievously assaulted and injured the victim and they
are thereafter seen leaving the hotel premises with weapons as
captured in the CCTV footage 40 seconds before the said victim is
helped by his friends and moved out from the premises and taken to
the hospital.
6. In so far as other four Accused persons are concerned, their
role is also described, inter alia, they having thrown the hotel furniture
on the injured victim in order to dislodge him because when the
injured victim had seen the three prinicipal assailants entering the
2 of 4
20.BA.3593.2026.doc
hotel premises flashing knives (choppers) in the hands and abusing
very loudly with the intent to harm and eliminate the injured victim,
the injured victim immediately pulled the show-sword which was put
up on the hotel wall in order to ward off the aggression of the three
principal assailants including the Applicant.
7. Though Mr. Gavit would argue that in view of the show
sword having been flashed by the victim, it was the injured victim who
was the aggressor, but the entire incident having been captured in the
CCTV footage and statement of the injured witness prima facie negates
the theory propounded by Mr. Gavit.
8. The attack and assault by the Applicant alongwith the other
two principal protagonists namely Ganesh Salve and Vicky Netawate is
extremely brutal and heinous. The intent of such assault and the
Medical Certificate and nature of injuries clearly show the intent to
eliminate the injured victim. While doing so as also been captured in
the CCTV footage as also in the witness statement that all 3 assailants
had administered threat to life constantly to the injured victim with
the intent of finishing and eliminating him permanently. The motive
of the crime being previous enmity is clearly borne out from the
record.
9. Though Mr. Gavit would claim parity with Vicky Netawate,
another co-accused, however in view of the specific role of Applicant
3 of 4
20.BA.3593.2026.doc
emanating from the material placed on record, I am not inclined to
consider the case of Applicant for grant of bail.
10. Hence, in view of the above, considering the gravity and
heinous nature of incident, Bail Application is therefore dismissed.
H. H. SAWANT [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
Digitally signed
by HARSHADA
HARSHADA HANUMANT
HANUMANT SAWANT
SAWANT Date:
2026.09.23
20:38:31 +0530
4 of 4
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.