Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

VIJAYKUMAR VYANKTESHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

A bail application may be dismissed as withdrawn when the applicant elects to withdraw it, even if the Court is disinclined to grant bail.

Summary

The applicant, Vijaukur Vyanktesh, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court against the State of Maharashtra. Counsel for the applicant, Mr. Yogesh Gangan (by Mr. Madhav Kulkarni), appeared and after the Court expressed its disinclination to grant bail, the counsel requested permission to withdraw the application. The Court allowed the withdrawal with liberty to re‑approach later in accordance with law. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive merits on bail were decided.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the applicant

Subjects

  • bail
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                                                                                         25. BA-3604-26.odt


    Amberkar

                                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                             BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3604 OF 2026

                Vijaukur Vyanktesh                                                 .. Applicant
                           Versus
                State of Maharashtra & Anr.                                        .. Respondents
                                       ....................
                 Mr. Yogesh Gangan i/by Mr. Madhav Kulkarni, Advocates for
                  Applicant
                 Ms. Sangeeta E. Phad, APP for State
                                                         ...................
                                                        CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                                        DATE          : SEPTEMBER 23, 2026
                P. C.:

                1.           Heard Mr. Gangan, learned Advocate for Applicant and Ms.

                Phad, learned APP for State.


                2.           After expressing my disinclination to allow the present Bail

                Application, Mr. Gangan in his usual fair mindedness persuades the

                Court to allow him to withdraw the present Bail Application with leave

                and liberty to approach this Court later on in accordance with law.


                3.           Reserving such liberty, present Bail Application is dismissed as

                withdrawn.



Amberkar                                                             [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]

                          Digitally signed
                          by RAVINDRA
               RAVINDRA   MOHAN
               MOHAN      AMBERKAR
               AMBERKAR   Date:
                          2026.09.23
                          19:50:30 +0530




                                                                                                    1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.