Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

AMOL DIGHAMBAR SONAVANEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Dismissed

Holding

The Court, disinclined to grant bail, permitted the applicant to withdraw the bail application and dismissed it.

Summary

Amol Dighambar Sonavane filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. The applicant was represented by Mr. Raj Bannatwala and Mr. Pritam Bhutada, while the State of Maharashtra was represented by Ms. Rajeshree V. Newton (as APP) and Ms. Rekha Musale. The presiding judge expressed a disinclination to grant bail and, upon the applicant's request, allowed him to withdraw the application with liberty to re‑approach the court later. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive discussion of the underlying charges or statutory provisions was made.

Issues considered

  • Whether the applicant is entitled to bail in the pending criminal proceedings
  • Whether the bail application can be withdrawn and dismissed by the court

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • withdrawal
  • high court
  • bail application

Judgment

                                                                 64.BA.3620.2025.doc

Ajay

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                         CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                       BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3620 OF 2025

       Amol Dighambar Sonavane                            .. Applicant
             Versus
       State of Maharashtra and Anr.                      .. Respondents

                              ....................
        Mr. Raj Bannatwala a/w. Mr. Pritam Bhutada, Advocates for
         Applicant.
        Ms. Rajeshree V. Newton, APP for Respondent No.1 – State.
        Ms. Rekha Musale, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
        GPSI – S.R. Bhise, Saswad Police Station, Pune Rural present.
                                    ......…...........

                                   CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                   DATE         : SEPTEMBER 23, 2026.

       P.C.:

       1.        Heard Mr. Bannatwala, learned Advocate for Applicant; Ms.

       Newton, learned APP for Respondent No.1 – State and Ms. Musale,

       learned Advocate for Respondent No.2.


       2.        After expressing my disinclination to Mr. Bannatwala for

       allowing the present Bail Application, in his usual fair mindedness he

       would submit that Applicant be allowed to withdraw the Bail

       Application with leave and liberty to the Applicant to approach this

       Court later in accordance with law.


       3.        Reserving such leave and liberty to Applicant as available to

       him in law, Bail Application is dismissed as withdrawn.


                                                                             1 of 2
                                                                                 64.BA.3620.2025.doc


                               4.   Bail Application is dismissed.


                                                                     [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]

     Ajay
            Digitally signed
            by AJAY
AJAY       TRAMBAK
TRAMBAK    UGALMUGALE
UGALMUGALE Date:
            2026.09.23
            16:07:07 +0530




                                                                                             2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.