Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHOBHA RAVINDRA KALBHORversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The court granted leave to withdraw the bail application and allowed the applicant to file a fresh bail application after five months.

Summary

The High Court of Bombay heard a criminal bail application filed by Shobha Ravindra Kalbhor Vaishali on behalf of the accused, Anil Tikam, against the State of Maharashtra. The applicant sought leave to withdraw the bail application and requested liberty to file a fresh application after a period of five months before the trial court. The learned counsel for the applicant presented submissions supporting the withdrawal. The court considered these submissions and exercised its discretion to grant the requested leave. Consequently, the bail application was disposed of as withdrawn, allowing the applicant to re‑file a new bail petition at a later date.

Issues considered

  • Whether the court may grant leave to withdraw a pending bail application and permit the filing of a fresh application after a specified period.

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • withdrawal of application
  • High Court
  • discretion

Judgment

                                                                          28-BA-3622-2025 (CR).doc


                   Tikam


                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                               CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3622 OF 2025

                                        SHOBHA RAVINDRA KALBHOR
VAISHALI                                           VERSUS
ANIL                                      STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
TIKAM
                   _________________________________________________________________
Digitally signed
by VAISHALI        Mr. Vipul Dushing a/w. Tanmay Kate a/w. Ashraf Kazi, Advocate for
ANIL TIKAM
Date:
                   Applicant.
2026.03.05
16:17:01 +0530     Mr. P.P. Jadhav, APP for Respondent-State.
                   Mr. Hrishikesh Ghorpade a/w. Dhairyasheel Jagtap i/b. Siddharth Sutaria,
                   Advocate for Intervenor.
                   _________________________________________________________________

                                                        CORAM        :   SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                        DATE         :   27th FEBRUARY, 2026.
                   P.C. :

                   1.         Heard learned counsel for the Applicant, learned APP and

                   learned counsel for intervenor.

                   2.         Learned counsel for the Applicant, on instructions, seeks leave

                   to withdraw this Bail Application with liberty to file a fresh bail Application

                   after five months before the trial Court.

                   3.         Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the

                   Applicant, leave is granted to withdraw the present Bail Application with

                   aforesaid liberty.

                   4.         Bail Application is disposed of accordingly as withdrawn.



                                                                   (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)

                                                     Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.