Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHAIKH RABBANI SHAIKH KADIRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Allowed To be withdrawn

Holding

The bail application was dismissed.

Summary

Shaikh Rabbani Shaikh Kadir filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court against the State of Maharashtra. The applicant was represented by Advocate Tejammul Khan. The learned Judge expressed a disinclination to grant bail and, at the applicant's request, allowed the application to be withdrawn without a substantive order on the merits. The Court reserved liberty for the applicant to approach the Court again in accordance with law. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the applicant in the pending criminal case

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • high court
  • withdrawal of application

Judgment

                                                                                        13.BA.3626.2026.doc

      HARSHADA H. SAWANT
            (P.A.)
                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                            BAIL APPLICATION NO.3626 OF 2026

                        Shaikh Rabbani Shaikh Kadir                                .. Applicant
                                   Versus
                        The State of Maharashtra                                   .. Respondent
                                                 ....................
                         Mr. Tejammul Khan, Advocate i/by Mizan Khan for Applicant.
                         Mr. Sukanta A. Karmakar, APP for Respondent – State.
                                                         ...................

                                                        CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                                        DATE          : SEPTEMBER 28, 2026
                        P.C.:

                        1.            Heard Mr. Khan, learned Advocate for Applicant and Mr.

                        Karmakar, learned APP for Respondent – State.


                        2.            After expressing my disinclination to the learned Advocate

                        for Applicant to grant bail, Mr. Khan persuades the Court to not pass

                        any order on merits and permit the Applicant to withdraw the present

                        Application reserving leave and liberty to the Applicant to approach

                        this Court in accordance with law.


                        3.            Reserving that liberty, Bail Application for bail stands

                        dismissed.



H. H. SAWANT                                                             [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]



                   Digitally signed
        HARSHADA   by HARSHADA
                   HANUMANT
        HANUMANT   SAWANT
        SAWANT     Date: 2026.09.28
                   19:49:31 +0530




                                                                                                    1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.