Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PRINCE CHITRASEN SINGHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Allowed To be withdrawn

Holding

The bail application is disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary

Prince Chitrasen Singh filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court against the State of Maharashtra. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Aniket Vagal, after hearing the court, requested that no substantive order be passed and that the applicant be permitted to withdraw the application, reserving the right to approach the court again if needed. The respondent's counsel, Mr. Amit Mundhe, opposed the request. The bench, after noting the applicant's desire to withdraw, exercised its discretion to allow the withdrawal without deciding the merits. Consequently, the bail application was disposed of as withdrawn, leaving the applicant free to file a fresh application in the future.

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • withdrawal of application
  • high court

Judgment

                                                                                                 17.BA.3634.2026.doc

      HARSHADA H. SAWANT
            (P.A.)
                                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                          CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                                    BAIL APPLICATION NO.3634 OF 2026

                          Prince Chitrasen Singh                                            .. Applicant
                                      Versus
                          The State of Maharashtra                                          .. Respondent
                                                     ....................
                           Mr. Aniket Vagal a/w. Ms. Juhi Kadu and Ms. Savvy Kolhekar,
                            Advocates for Applicant.
                           Mr. Amit Mundhe, APP for Respondent – State.
                                                                  ...................

                                                                 CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                                                 DATE          : SEPTEMBER 28, 2026
                          P.C.:

                          1.                  Heard Mr. Vagal, learned Advocate for Applicant and Mr.

                          Mundhe, learned APP for Respondent.


                          2.                  After expressing my disinclination to grant bail in the present

                          Bail Application, Mr. Vagal would persuade the Court to not pass any

                          order on merits and allow Applicant to withdraw the present

                          Application reserving the leave and liberty to Applicant to approach

                          this Court in accordance with law.


                          3.                  Reserving such leave and liberty as may be available to

                          Applicant in law, present Application is disposed as withdrawn.



H. H. SAWANT                                                                      [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]



                           Digitally signed
               HARSHADA by HARSHADA
                        HANUMANT
               HANUMANT SAWANT
               SAWANT   Date: 2026.09.28
                           19:42:50 +0530




                                                                                                             1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.