Bombay High Court
ANIL ASHOK JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Allowed To be withdrawn
Holding
The bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
The applicant, Anil Ashok Jadhav, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court seeking release from custody. Counsel for the applicant, Mr. Vivek Arote, appeared before the bench of Justice Milind N. Jadhav. The judge expressed a disinclination to grant bail but, upon the applicant's counsel's request, permitted the applicant to withdraw the application. The court reserved leave for the applicant to approach the court again in the future, if permissible by law. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate decision on the applicant's bail application?
Subjects
- bail
- criminal procedure
- withdrawal of application
- High Court
- judicial discretion
Judgment
20. BA 3658-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3658 OF 2026
Anil Ashok Jadhav .Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .Respondent
ANAND
SUDHAKAR
SUDAME Mr. Vivek Arote a/w. Mr. Akshay Dingale, Advocates, for the Applicant
Digitally signed by
ANAND SUDHAKAR
Mr. S. K. Karmakar, APP, for the Respondent – State
SUDAME
Date: 2026.09.30 Mr. Israil Shaikh, PSI, Sinhgad Road Police Station, Pune present
19:03:07 +0530
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
DATE : 29.09.2026
P. C.
1. Heard Mr. Arote, learned Counsel for the Applicant and
Mr. Karmakar, learned APP for the Respondent – State.
2. After expressing my disinclination to grant the present
Application, learned Advocate on instructions would persuade me to
allow the Applicant to withdraw the present Application reserving
leave and liberty to the Applicant to approach this Court later in
accordance with law.
3. Reserving such leave and liberty to the Applicant as may be
available in law, the present Application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(MILIND N. JADHAV, J.)
Anand 1 of 1
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.