Bombay High Court
SAMIR CHAITANYA BISWASversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The court granted regular bail to the accused in the murder case.
Summary
The applicant, Samir C. Biswas, was arrested for murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code in a case arising from a dispute with a co‑worker. The prosecution’s case relied on circumstantial evidence and an alleged extra‑judicial confession, while the defence argued that the evidence was insufficient and the trial had not progressed beyond framing of charge after three years of incarceration. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offence, whereas the applicant’s counsel emphasized the delay and lack of substantive progress. The judge noted the reliance on circumstantial evidence and the prolonged pre‑trial detention, concluding that the applicant could be released on bail. Accordingly, bail was granted on condition of a personal bond of Rs.25,000 with sureties and monthly reporting to the police.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted in a murder case (Section 302 IPC) pending trial
- Whether the circumstantial evidence and alleged extra‑judicial confession justify denial of bail
- Whether the three‑year pre‑trial detention without trial commencement warrants bail
Legislation cited
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 302
Subjects
- bail
- murder
- Section 302 IPC
- circumstantial evidence
- pre‑trial detention
- extra‑judicial confession
- criminal procedure
Judgment
19-ba-3665-25.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3665 OF 2025
Samir C. Biswas …Applicant
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent.
…………..
Mr. Nagesh Khedkar a/w. Mr. Prashant Gatkul for the Applicant.
Mr. S.R. Agarkar, APP for the Respondent/State.
HC Vijay S. Marne, Haveli Police Station, Pune Rural is present.
…………..
CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J.
DATE : 02.02.2026.
P.C. :
1. This is an application for regular bail.
2. The applicant came to be arrested in Crime No.238 of 2022
registered at Haveli Police Station, Pune Rural for the offence
punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The deceased and the applicant were working as a waiter
and cook respectively in the hotel owned by the first informant. It
is alleged that on the date of incident which took place on 30 th
October 2022, on account of some trivial issue, dispute arose
between the applicant and the deceased, and during the said
dispute, the present applicant assaulted the deceased by iron rod
and committed his murder.
4. I have heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the
learned APP for the respondent – State.
5. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the case is
based on circumstantial evidence. It is submitted that the
applicant is in jail for more than 3 years and there is no progress
Dinesh S. Sherla 1/2
19-ba-3665-25.doc
in the trial except framing of charge.
6. On the other hand, learned APP for the respondent/State
submits that the applicant is involved in serious crime of murder.
It is submitted that there is enough incriminating material against
the applicant including his extra judicial confession. It is submitted
that considering the nature of crime, the applicant may not be
released on bail.
7. I have perused the charge-sheet. The case is based on
circumstantial evidence. The applicant is in jail for more than 3
years. The trial is not likely to be concluded in the future as it has
not yet commenced. Considering the overall facts and
circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the applicant
on bail. In the result, the following order is passed.
ORDER
A] The Application is allowed.
B] The applicant be released on bail in C.R. No. 238 of
2022 registered at Haveli Police Station, Pune Rural for the
offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal
Code on furnishing P.R Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/-
(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with one or two sureties in
the like amount.
C] The applicant shall attend the concerned police station
once in a month ,i.e., on first Saturday between 11.00 a.m.
to 2.00 p.m. till conclusion of the trial.
[N.R.BORKAR, J.]
Dinesh S. Sherla 2/2
Checking your session…