Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SADHU HULRAM MANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Allowed

Holding

The court held that bail should be granted subject to strict conditions.

Summary

The applicant, Sadhu Hulram Mane, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a case involving alleged illegal LPG cylinder refilling that attracted charges under Sections 287 read with 288 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, and Section 5 of the Explosive Substance Act, 1908. The prosecution argued that the refilling operation was dangerous and that the applicant might tamper with evidence. The court noted that the refilling equipment had already been seized, the applicant’s livelihood depended on the business, and he had deep roots in the community, concluding that further custodial interrogation was unnecessary. Relying on these prima facie observations, the court granted bail with a cash bond and a series of reporting and conduct conditions. The order expressly limited its observations to bail considerations and left the trial to be decided on the merits of the evidence.

Issues considered

  • Whether the applicant is entitled to bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 despite the seriousness of the offences alleged.
  • Whether the seizure of the refilling equipment and the applicant's community ties eliminate the risk of evidence tampering sufficient to justify bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • LPG cylinder refilling
  • essential commodities
  • explosive substances
  • prima facie
  • evidence tampering
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                                                                5.BA.3728.2026.doc

Ajay

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                          CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                       BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3728 OF 2026

       Sadhu Hulram Mane                                  .. Applicant
                  Versus
       The State of Maharashtra                           .. Respondent

                              ....................
        Mr. Prashant Mohite a/w. Ms. Divya Jagdale, Advocates for
         Applicant.
        Mr. Yogesh M. Nakhwa, APP for Respondent.
                                    ...................

                                   CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                   DATE          : OCTOBER 05, 2026

       P.C.:

       1.        Heard Mr. Mohite, learned Advocate for Applicant and Mr.

       Nakhwa, learned APP for Respondent.


       2.        This is an Application under Section 483 of Bharatiya

       Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking bail in connection with C.R.

       No.535 of 2026 registered with Chikhali Police Station for offences

       punishable under Sections 287 read with 288 of the Bharatiya Nyaya

       Sanhita, 2023; Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act,

       1955 and Section 5 of the Explosive Substance Act, 1908.


       3.        Case of the prosecution is that Applicant was refilling the

       LPG cylinders by employing a transfer circuit in the establishment

       called ‘Mahalaxmi General Stores and Stationery’ in Jadhavwadi area

       of Pune. According to the prosecution, the said operation of transfer of

                                                                           1 of 4
                                                         5.BA.3728.2026.doc


LPG gas from a larger cylinder to a smaller cylinder was dangerous and

therefore Applicant has been apprehended.


4.        Applicant is running the establishment which is a source and

means of his livelihood. The refilling circuit and all other material has

already been seized by the prosecution and therefore there is no

possibility of Applicant tampering or destroying any evidence.

Applicant is having deep roots in society and is a permanent resident of

the area and has been residing over there since long. In that view of

the matter and considering the aforesaid prima facie material, further

custodial interrogation of Applicant is not necessary in my opinion. The

Applicant is therefore granted bail.


5.        Hence, in view of above prima facie observations and

findings, Bail Application of Applicant is allowed subject to the

following terms and conditions:-


          (i)   Applicant – Sadhu Hulram Mane is directed to be

                immediately released from prison in connection with

                CR. No.535 of 2026;


          (ii) Applicant is directed to be released on bail on

                furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs.15,000/- (Rs. Fifteen

                Thousand only) with one or two sureties in the like

                amount;




                                                                    2 of 4
                                                5.BA.3728.2026.doc


(iii) Applicant shall report to the Investigating Officer at

     Chikhali Police Station, once every month, on the first

     Sunday of the month between 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.

     until commencement of trial and thereafter shall attend

     all dates of hearing before the Trial Court;


(iv) Applicant shall cooperate with the conduct of the trial

     and remain present before the Trial Court on all dates,

     unless specifically exempted. Applicant shall not seek

     unnecessary adjournments. Any such conduct shall

     entitle the prosecution to apply for cancellation of bail;


(v) Applicant shall not leave the State of Maharashtra

     without prior permission of the Trial Court;


(vi) Applicant shall not influence any of the witnesses or

     tamper with the evidence in any manner;


(vii) Applicant shall keep the Investigating Officer informed

     of his current residential address and mobile telephone

     number and shall forthwith inform the Investigating

     Officer of any change in his residential address or

     mobile telephone number, as and when such change

     occurs; and




                                                           3 of 4
                                                                                               5.BA.3728.2026.doc


                                               (viii)Any breach or infraction of any of the aforesaid

                                                    conditions shall entail cancellation of the bail granted to

                                                    the Applicant.


                                     6.        It is clarified that the observations made in this order are

                                     limited for the purpose of granting bail only and I have not made any

                                     observations on merits of the case. The trial shall be adjudicated on

                                     the strength of the evidence led and strictly on its own merits being

                                     uninfluenced with any of the prima facie observations made

                                     hereinabove in this order.


                                     7.        Bail Application is allowed and disposed in the above terms.



                                                                                [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]

        Ajay
               Digitally signed by
AJAY       AJAY TRAMBAK
TRAMBAK    UGALMUGALE
UGALMUGALE Date: 2026.10.05
               14:59:48 +0530




                                                                                                          4 of 4


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.