Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PRASHANT RAMESH KADAMversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Allowed

Holding

Bail is granted to the applicant under Section 439 CrPC, subject to strict conditions.

Summary

The applicant, Prashant Ramesh Kadam, sought bail under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case (CR No. 797 of 2021) involving alleged cheating, criminal breach of trust and criminal intimidation under IPC Sections 420, 406 and 506 read with Section 34. The prosecution alleged that he collected Rs. 1.82 crore from nine investors for purported share and real‑estate investments, of which Rs. 1.01 crore was returned, while the balance remained unpaid. The applicant had been in custody for over four years, with the charge formally framed on 21‑08‑2026 and no substantive progress in the trial. The court noted the substantial partial restitution and the prolonged pre‑trial detention as prima facie factors favoring bail. Consequently, the court granted bail subject to a personal bond of Rs. 25,000, sureties, regular reporting to the investigating officer, and strict compliance with conditions to prevent witness tampering or absconding. The order expressly limited its observations to bail and refrained from commenting on the merits of the underlying offences. The bail was ordered to be effective immediately, with cancellation provisions for any breach of the stipulated conditions.

Issues considered

  • What considerations under Section 439 CrPC justify granting bail in a case involving offences of cheating, criminal breach of trust and criminal intimidation?
  • Does the applicant's prolonged pre‑trial detention and partial restitution of the alleged fraud amount warrant bail despite the seriousness of the offences?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Section 439 CrPC
  • cheating
  • criminal breach of trust
  • criminal intimidation
  • IPC
  • investment fraud
  • pre‑trial detention
  • conditions of bail

Judgment

                                                                9.BA.3733.2026.doc

Ajay

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                         CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                      BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3733 OF 2026

       Prashant Ramesh Kadam                              .. Applicant
                  Versus
       The State of Maharashtra                           .. Respondent

                               ....................
        Mr. R. Sathyanarayanan a/w. Mr. Vishal Narkar, Advocates for
         Applicant.
        Mr. Amit K. Mundhe, APP for Respondent.
                                    ...................

                                  CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                  DATE           : OCTOBER 05, 2026

       P.C.:

       1.       Heard Mr. Sathyanarayanan, learned Advocate for Applicant

       and Mr. Mundhe, learned APP for Respondent.


       2.       This is an Application under Section 439 of the Code of

       Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking bail in connection with C.R. No.797

       of 2021 registered with Kamothe Police Station for offences punishable

       under Sections 420, 406 and 506 read with 34 of the Indian Penal

       Code, 1860.


       3.       In the present case, there are 9 investors from whom, on

       their own volition and voluntarily certain amounts were received by

       Applicant to the tune of Rs.1.82 crores as per the prosecution case.

       Applicant has through his bank statement been able to show to the

       Court that Rs.1.01 crores have already been returned back by him to

                                                                           1 of 4
                                                          9.BA.3733.2026.doc


the said investors. The rest of the amounts were not paid. It is prima

facie seen from the record of the case that the monies were received

by Applicant for investment in shares and real estate business on the

basis of which returns were promised.


4.        Considering the fact that substantial amounts of returns have

already been paid to the tune of Rs.1.01 crores out of Rs.1.82 crores

and Applicant having been incarcerated for the past 4 years and 3

months and charge having been framed on 21.08.2026 and no further

progress in the trial, I am inclined to consider the case of Applicant for

bail.


5.        Hence, in view of above prima facie observations and

findings, Bail Application of Applicant is allowed subject to the

following terms and conditions:-


          (i)   Applicant – Prashant Ramesh Kadam is directed to be

                immediately released from prison in connection with

                CR. No.497 of 2021;


          (ii) Applicant is directed to be released on bail on

                furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five

                Thousand only) with one or two sureties in the like

                amount;




                                                                     2 of 4
                                                9.BA.3733.2026.doc


(iii) Applicant shall report to the Investigating Officer at

     Kamothe Police Station, once every month, on the first

     Monday of the month between 10:00 a.m. to 12:00

     p.m. until commencement of trial and thereafter shall

     attend all dates of hearing before the Trial Court;


(iv) Applicant shall cooperate with the conduct of the trial

     and remain present before the Trial Court on all dates,

     unless specifically exempted. Applicant shall not seek

     unnecessary adjournments. Any such conduct shall

     entitle the prosecution to apply for cancellation of bail;


(v) Applicant shall not leave the State of Maharashtra

     without prior permission of the Trial Court;


(vi) Applicant shall not influence any of the witnesses or

     tamper with the evidence in any manner;


(vii) Applicant shall keep the Investigating Officer informed

     of his current residential address and mobile telephone

     number and shall forthwith inform the Investigating

     Officer of any change in his residential address or

     mobile telephone number, as and when such change

     occurs; and




                                                           3 of 4
                                                                                           9.BA.3733.2026.doc


                                           (viii)Any breach or infraction of any of the aforesaid

                                                conditions shall entail cancellation of the bail granted to

                                                the Applicant.


                                 6.        It is clarified that the observations made in this order are

                                 limited for the purpose of granting bail only and I have not made any

                                 observations on merits of the case. The trial shall be adjudicated on

                                 the strength of the evidence led and strictly on its own merits being

                                 uninfluenced with any of the prima facie observations made

                                 hereinabove in this order.


                                 7.        Bail Application is allowed and disposed in the above terms.



                                                                            [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]

         Ajay
              Digitally signed
              by AJAY
AJAY       TRAMBAK
TRAMBAK    UGALMUGALE
UGALMUGALE Date: 2026.10.05
              14:56:03 +0530




                                                                                                      4 of 4


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.