Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RUSHIKESH BHUJANG SURTEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Allowed To be withdrawn

Holding

The bail application was dismissed as withdrawn upon the applicant's request.

Summary

The applicant, Rushikesh Bhujang Surte, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court in a criminal appellate matter against the State of Maharashtra. Counsel for the applicant, Mr. M.S. Mulla, after hearing the State's counsel, expressed a desire to withdraw the bail application. The court, after considering the request, permitted the withdrawal, granting the applicant liberty to re‑approach the court later if required. No substantive discussion on the merits of bail was undertaken. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Subjects

  • bail
  • withdrawal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • High Court of Bombay

Judgment

                                                                                         5. BA-3755-26.odt


    Amberkar

                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                            BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3755 OF 2026

               Rushikesh Bhujang Surte                                            .. Applicant
                          Versus
               State of Maharashtra                                               .. Respondent
                                         ....................
                Mr. M.S. Mulla a/w Mr. Zaheer Mulla & Mr. Rajdeep Sitapure,
                 Advocates for Applicant
                Ms. Sangeeta E. Phad, APP for State
                Mr. Ravi Shivaji Jadhav, PSI, Bharati Vidyapeeth Police Station,
                 Pune
                                                        ...................
                                                       CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                                       DATE          : OCTOBER 7, 2026
               P. C.:

               1.        Heard Mr. Mulla, learned Advocate for Applicant and Ms. Phad,

               learned APP for State.


               2.        After expressing my disinclination to allow the present Bail

               Application, Mr. Mulla in his usual fair mindedness persuades the

               Court to allow him to withdraw the present Bail Application with leave

               and liberty to approach this Court later on in accordance with law.


               3.        Reserving such liberty, present Bail Application is dismissed as

               withdrawn.


Amberkar                                                            [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]

                         Digitally signed
                         by RAVINDRA
               RAVINDRA MOHAN
               MOHAN    AMBERKAR
               AMBERKAR Date:
                         2026.10.07
                         19:37:01 +0530




                                                                                                   1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.