Bombay High Court
GOPAL ASHOK PATEKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Allowed
Holding
The Court granted bail to the applicant, finding insufficient prima facie evidence to justify continued detention.
Summary
Gopal Ashok Patekar was arrested on 14 October 2025 in connection with CR No. 465 of 2025 for alleged offences under Section 310(4)(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Arms Act and Section 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act. The applicant contended that his arrest was solely a product of the "Clean Nashik Campaign" and that there was no prima facie evidence linking him to the alleged crime. He filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, arguing that the prosecution had not produced any incriminating material. The Court observed that the prosecution’s case was indeed lacking in substantive evidence and that mere apprehension at night could not justify continued detention. Consequently, the Court granted regular bail subject to a set of conditions, while expressly stating that the order was limited to bail and did not address the merits of the case.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate exercise of discretion under Section 483 BNSS in granting bail when the prosecution has not produced prima facie evidence?
- Whether the applicant's arrest, allegedly motivated by the "Clean Nashik Campaign," can be sustained in the absence of material linking him to the offences charged?
Legislation cited
- Arms Act — s. 25, 4
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 310(4)(5)
- Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 483
- Maharashtra Police Act — s. 135
Subjects
- bail
- prima facie evidence
- criminal procedure
- Arms Act
- Maharashtra Police Act
- Section 310
- Section 483
- Clean Nashik Campaign
Judgment
13. BA 3767-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3767 OF 2026
Gopal Ashok Patekar .Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .Respondents
ANAND
SUDHAKAR
SUDAME Mr. Himanshu S. Gavit a/w. Ms. Uma Mundada, Advocates, for the
Digitally signed by
ANAND SUDHAKAR
Applicant
SUDAME
Date: 2026.10.07 Mr. S. A. Karmakar, APP, for the Respondent – State
20:44:33 +0530
Mr. Suyog Waykar, API, Upnagar Police Station, Nashik present
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
DATE : 07.10.2026
P. C.
1. Heard Mr. Gavit, learned Counsel for the Applicant and
Mr. Karmakar, learned APP for the Respondent – State.
2. This Application is filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) in connection with
C.R.No. 465 of 2025 registered with Upnagar Police Station, Nashik for
offences punishable under Section 310(4)(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya
Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNS”), under Section 4/25 of the Arms Act
and under Section 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act.
3. The Applicant seeks regular bail having been arrested on
14.10.2025. Case of the Applicant is that his role and participation in
Anand 1 of 4
13. BA 3767-2026.doc
the crime is not there at all. It is seen that only because of the
“Clean Nashik Campaign” which was promulgated by the local
Municipal Corporation and the Area Committee along with the Police,
the Applicant has been arrested on the basis of his earlier antecedent
which is not connected with the present alleged offence at all. There is
no prima facie incriminating material placed on record by the
prosecution to show participation and conspiracy or the Applicant
being part thereof to commit the crime, save and except to state that
the Applicant was apprehended late in the night and that merely
cannot be ground for his detention. In that view of the matter, the
Applicant has made out a case for grant of bail.
4. Hence, in view of above prima facie observations and finding,
Bail Application of Applicant is allowed subject to the following terms
and conditions:-
(i) Applicant – Gopal Ashok Patekar is directed to be
immediately released from prison in connection with
CR. No. 465 of 2025;
(ii) Applicant is directed to be released on bail on furnishing
P.R. Bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand
only) with one surety of the like amount;
(iii) Applicant shall report to the Investigating Officer at
Anand 2 of 4
13. BA 3767-2026.doc
Upnagar Police Station, Nashik, once every month, on
the first Monday of the month between 10:00 a.m. to
12:00 p.m. until commencement of trial and thereafter
shall attend all dates of hearing before the Trial Court;
(iv) Applicant shall co-operate with the conduct of the trial
and remain present before the Trial Court on all dates,
unless specifically exempted. Applicant shall not seek
unnecessary adjournments. Any such conduct shall
entitle the prosecution to apply for cancellation of bail;
(v) Applicant shall not leave the State of Maharashtra
without prior permission of the Trial Court;
(vi) Applicant shall not influence any of the witnesses or
tamper with the evidence in any manner;
(vii) Applicant shall keep the Investigating Officer informed
of his current residential address and mobile telephone
number and shall forthwith inform the Investigating
Officer of any change in his residential address or
mobile telephone number, as and when such change
occurs; and
(viii)Any breach or infraction of any of the aforesaid
Anand 3 of 4
13. BA 3767-2026.doc
conditions shall entail cancellation of the bail granted to
the Applicant.
5. It is clarified that the observations made in this order are limited
for the purpose of granting bail only and I have not made any
observations on merits of the case. The trial shall be adjudicated on
the strength of the evidence led and strictly on its own merits being
uninfluenced with any of the prima facie observations made
hereinabove in this order.
6. Bail Application is allowed and disposed in the above terms.
(MILIND N. JADHAV, J.)
Anand 4 of 4
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.