Bombay High Court
PRAVIN SHRINIVAS MAHAJANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- SHIVKUMAR DIGE
Holding
The Court held that the phrase should be corrected as per the praecipe, and the order amended accordingly.
Summary
The applicant, Pravin Shrinivas Mahajan, filed a bail application before the High Court of Bombay. The Court examined a praecipe filed on 25 March 2026 seeking correction of the order dated 18 March 2026. The specific amendment requested was to replace the phrase “if there is no substantive progress in the trial after six months” with “before learned Trial Court”. The Court agreed to the correction, directing that the necessary amendment be made in the original order and that the corrected order be uploaded. All other portions of the original order were left unchanged and the praecipe was disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether the phrase “if there is no substantive progress in the trial after six months” in the order dated 18.03.2026 should be replaced with “before learned Trial Court”
Subjects
- bail
- order correction
- procedural amendment
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
- High Court of Bombay
Judgment
502-BA-3903-25.doc
S.S.Kilaje
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3903 OF 2025
Pravin Shrinivas Mahajan … Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
_________________________________________________________________
Mr. Priyash More i/b. Mr. Samay Pawar, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr. B. B. Kulkarni, APP for the Respondent – State.
_________________________________________________________________
SONALI by
Digitally signed
SONALI
SATISH KILAJE
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
SATISH Date:
2026.03.27
KILAJE 17:39:42
+0700
DATE : 25th MARCH, 2026.
P.C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Perused the praecipe dated 25.03.2026 for speaking to minutes
of order dated 18.03.2026.
3. In the Order dated 18.03.2026, in paragraph No. 2, the words
“if there is no substantive progress in the trial after six months” be replaced
with the words “before learned Trial Court”.
4. Necessary corrections be carried out in the original order and
the corrected order be uploaded. Rest of the order shall remain as it is.
5. Praecipe is disposed of.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
Page 1 of 1
Checking your session…