Bombay High Court
DATTA VISHNU SALVIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismissed
- Bench
- R M JOSHI
Holding
The bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution due to the applicant's non‑appearance.
Summary
The applicant, Datta Vishnu Salvi, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant even on the final date of hearing. The respondent, State of Maharashtra, was represented by Mr. H. J. Dedhia. The Court noted the absence of any representation for the applicant and consequently dismissed the bail application for want of prosecution. No substantive merits of the bail request were considered.
Issues considered
- What is the effect of the applicant's failure to appear or be represented on the bail application?
Subjects
- bail
- criminal procedure
- non‑appearance
- want of prosecution
Judgment
23-BA-3977-2025.DOC
Shivgan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3977 OF 2025
Datta Vishnu Salvi …Applicant
Versus
State of Maharashtra …Respondents
None for the Applicant.
Mr. H. J. Dedhia, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM: R. M. JOSHI, J.
DATED: 8th APRIL, 2026.
PC:-
1. None for the Applicant.
2. Even on the last date of hearing, none has caused
appearance on behalf of the Applicant.
3. Hence, the Bail Application is dismissed for want of
prosecution.
(R. M. JOSHI, J.)
{
Digitally
signed by
SHAMBHAVI
SHAMBHAVI NILESH
NILESH SHIVGAN
SHIVGAN Date:
2026.04.08
15:55:25
+0530
Page 1 of 1
th
8 April, 2026.
Checking your session…