Bombay High Court
TAKYA ALIAS ATISH DATTA NETAKEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
- Disposal
- Disposed off as Withdrawn
Holding
The High Court allowed the withdrawal of the bail application and granted liberty to approach the trial court for a fresh application.
Summary
The applicant, Takya Alias Atish Datta Netake, filed a criminal bail application before the Bombay High Court. The State counsel pointed out that any renewal of bail must be made before the trial court, referencing an earlier order dated 17 September 2025. The applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the current application and re‑file before the trial court as permitted. The State did not oppose the withdrawal. The court granted leave to withdraw the application, directing that any fresh bail request be considered on its merits by the trial court, and disposed of the present application as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether a bail application pending before the High Court can be withdrawn and re‑filed before the trial court in accordance with the earlier order.
Subjects
- bail
- withdrawal
- procedural law
- criminal procedure
- high court
Judgment
504.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 408 OF 2026
Takya Alias Atish Datta Netake ...Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra And Anr. ...Respondents
__________________________________________________________
Mr. Pratik Tare i/b Mane S. Y., for the Applicant.
Dr. Ashvini Takalkar, APP for the Respondent – State.
__________________________________________________________
CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
DATE : 27th August, 2026.
P.C. :
1. This Application is circulated pursuant to the praecipe
dated 27.08.2026. Same is taken on record and marked “X” for
identification. In view of the urgency expressed by Mr. Pratik Tare,
learned Advocate for the Applicant, this Application was ordered
to be placed on the “Production Board.”
2. Dr. Ashvini Takalkar, learned APP for the Respondent –
State, by referring to the order dated 17.09.2025 passed by this
Court in Criminal Bail Application No. 972 of 2025, submits that in
the event the Applicant intends to renew his request for bail, then
the same is to be done before the Trial Court at the first instance.
Arjun 1
504.doc
3. Faced with the said objection, Mr. Pratik Tare, learned
Advocate for the Applicant, on instructions from the Applicant,
seeks leave to withdraw the present Application with liberty to
approach the Trial Court in terms of the liberty granted by this
Court vide order dated 17.09.2025 passed in Criminal Bail
Application No. 972 of 2025.
4. The request made by Mr. Pratik Tare, learned Advocate for
the Applicant, is not opposed by Dr. Ashvini Takalkar, learned APP
for the Respondent – State.
5. In view of the statement made by Mr. Pratik Tare, learned
Advocate for the Applicant, leave is granted to withdraw the
present Application with liberty as prayed.
6. If a fresh Bail Application is filed before the Trial Court,
same be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law.
7. Criminal Bail Application No. 408 of 2026 is disposed of as
withdrawn.
(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)
Digitally
signed by
ARJUN
ARJUN KRISHNA
KRISHNA RODGE
RODGE Date: Arjun 2
2026.09.01
11:02:45
+0530
Checking your session…