Bombay High Court
ANAND SHIVAJI SABALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Disposal
- Allowed
Holding
The Court held that bail should be granted under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, given the FIR delay, the complainant’s no‑objection, and the lack of necessity for further incarceration.
Summary
Anand Shivaji Sabale applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 64(1), 351(2) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for alleged rape. The FIR was lodged on 16 February 2026 for an incident that allegedly occurred on 9 February 2026, creating a delay that the applicant argued indicated false implication. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offence, medical evidence and the risk of the applicant influencing witnesses. The complainant later filed an affidavit stating the matter was settled and expressed no objection to bail. Considering the delay, the complainant’s no‑objection and the possibility of unnecessary incarceration, the Court exercised its discretion under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S. and granted bail with conditions, disposing the application.
Issues considered
- The appropriateness of granting bail in a serious offence of rape when the FIR is delayed.
- Whether the complainant’s affidavit of settlement and no‑objection affects the bail decision.
- The applicability of Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for granting bail.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 351(2), 351(3), 483, 64(1)
Subjects
- bail
- rape
- FIR delay
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
- Section 483
- no objection affidavit
- criminal procedure
Judgment
12 - BA-430-2026 (CR).docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 430 OF 2026
Anand Shivaji Sabale … Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents
——————
Mr. Hrishikesh Sopan Shinde (Through V.C.) a/w. Ms. Neha Deshpande for
the Applicant.
Mr. A.S. Shalgaonkar, A.P.P. for the Respondents-State.
Mr. Abhang Suryawanshi for the complainant.
Mr. Mihir Mondkar, appointed Advocate for the complainant.
——————
Coram : MEHROZ K. PATHAN, J.
Date : 10th July 2026.
PER COURT :
1. Learned appointed Advocate Mr. Mihir Mondkar is discharged as
Advocate Mr. Abhang Suryawanshi has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of the
complainant.
2. The Applicant has approached this Court seeking regular bail in
connection with F.I.R. No. 117 of 2026, dated 16/02/2026, registered with
Mohol Police Station, District Solapur Rural, for the offences punishable
under Sections 64(1), 351(2), 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
osk 1 of 4
12 - BA-430-2026 (CR).docx
3. Learned counsel for the Applicant submits that there is a considerable
delay in lodging of the F.I.R.. The incident is allegedly taken place on
09/02/2026, whereas the same is reported on 16/02/2026. There is no
explanation for the delay caused. The Applicant was running a dance party,
wherein the complainant was also working as one of the dancers. The
allegations of rape are deliberately made to falsely implicate the present
Applicant in the said crime due to some dispute between the Applicant and
the complainant. The Applicant was arrested on 11/03/2026. The entire
investigation is already complete and the chargesheet is also filed. There are
no neighbouring witnesses who have seen the Applicant forcibly taking away
the complainant and allegedly committing the forcible sexual intercourse.
The Applicant is not having any criminal antecedents and is ready to abide by
any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, the Applicant may
be released on regular bail.
4. Learned A.P.P. on the other hand strongly opposed the bail application
on the ground that the Applicant is involved in serious offence of rape on a
girl aged 21 years. The offence is punishable with life imprisonment, which
mean remainder of life. The Applicant had taken undue advantage of the
complainant, who is working with his dance party and has systematically
exploited the victim girl and committed rape on her. The medical evidence
corroborates the allegations. Thus, after completion of investigation,
osk 2 of 4
12 - BA-430-2026 (CR).docx
chargesheet is filed. If the Applicant is released on bail, there is every
likelihood that the Applicant may threaten the prosecutrix and thereby cause
prejudice to the prosecution’s case. Hence, the Application may be rejected.
5. Learned counsel for the complainant, who has filed his V.P. in the Court
today along with his Affidavit submits that the F.I.R. is lodged out of
misunderstanding and the matter is amicably settled between the Applicant
and the complainant. The Affidavit to that effect is placed on record and
marked as “X” for identification.
6. Taking into consideration the nature of allegations and the
considerable delay in lodging the F.I.R. for forcible sexual intercourse and
taking into consideration the “no objection” filed by the complainant herself,
the submission that the Applicant is falsely implicated in the present crime
appears to be probable. I am thus inclined to exercise discretion under
Section 483 of B.N.S.S. for releasing the Applicant. The investigation is
already over. The chargesheet is also filed. The Trial will take its own time to
conclude. No fruitful purpose will be served by further incarceration of the
Applicant. Hence, the following order :-
ORDER
i. The Application is allowed.
ii. The Applicant - Anand Shivaji Sabale be released on bail in
connection with F.I.R. No. 117 of 2026, dated 16/02/2026,
registered with Mohol Police Station, District Solapur Rural, for
osk 3 of 4
12 - BA-430-2026 (CR).docx
the offences punishable under Sections 64(1), 351(2), 351(3)
of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, on furnishing P.R. Bond
of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with one or two
solvent sureties in the like amount, on the following
conditions :-
(A) The Applicant shall attend the concerned Police Station
once in every two months starting from 01/08/2026.
(B) The Applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution
witnesses and shall not tamper with the prosecution
evidence, in any manner.
(C) The Applicant shall submit his Aadhar Card and Pan Card
to the Investigating Officer along with mobile numbers
and addresses of two of his near relatives.
7. Needless to say, a single violation of any of the conditions imposed by
this Court shall entitle the prosecution and the complainant to seek
cancellation of bail of the present Applicant.
8. The Application stands disposed off accordingly.
[ MEHROZ K. PATHAN, J. ]
osk 4 of 4
Checking your session…