Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

DEVRAJ MALLIKARJUN GADKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Allowed

Holding

The order may be corrected to reflect the proper name "Aanchal Chemicals" and to delete the word "also", and the praecipe is disposed.

Summary

The High Court heard applications for bail filed by four accused persons in separate bail applications (BA-1621-25, BA-1779-25, BA-2738-26, BA-4352-25). After the order dated 07.09.2026 was pronounced, the applicant’s counsel filed a praecipe on 08.09.2026 seeking correction of a clerical error – the name "Vighnahartha Logistics Company" was to be changed to "Aanchal Chemicals" and the word "also" in paragraph 8 was to be deleted. The Court examined the praecipe and found no substantive issue, only a need to rectify the typographical mistakes. Accordingly, the Court directed that the order be corrected as requested and that the corrected order be uploaded, leaving the rest of the order undisturbed. The praecipe was thereafter disposed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the order dated 07.09.2026 may be corrected to amend clerical errors concerning the name of a party and an extraneous word?

Subjects

  • bail
  • praecipe
  • clerical correction
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • court order amendment

Judgment

                                                P1. BA-1621-25 1779-25 2738-26 & 4352-25.odt


Amberkar

                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                          BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1621 OF 2025

           Chandra Mani Matamani Tiwari                                Applicant
                                                                    .. (Accused No. 5)
                      Versus
           State of Maharashtra                                     .. Respondent

                                        WITH
                          BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1779 OF 2025

           Kamal Jayramdas Jeswani                                     Applicant
                                                                    .. (Accused No. 1)
                      Versus
           State of Maharashtra                                     .. Respondent

                                        WITH
                          BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2738 OF 2026

           Mateen Babu Shaikh                                          Applicant
                                                                    .. (Accused No. 2)
                      Versus
           State of Maharashtra                                     .. Respondent

                                        WITH
                          BAIL APPLICATION NO. 4352 OF 2025

           Devraj Mallikarjun Gadkar                                   Applicant
                                                                    .. (Accused No. 4)
                      Versus
           State of Maharashtra                                     .. Respondent

                                      ....................
            Mr. Aditya Targe, Advocate for Applicant in BA 1779/25
                                          ...................
                                         CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                         DATE          : SEPTEMBER 8, 2026




                                                                                         1 of 2
                                             P1. BA-1621-25 1779-25 2738-26 & 4352-25.odt


           P. C.:
           1.     Not on board. Mentioned by way of filing a praecipe dated

           08.09.2026 for speaking to the minutes of order dated 07.09.2026.


           2.      Heard Mr. Targe, learned Advocate for Applicant.


           3.      In view of the praecipe filed, the name "Vighnahartha Logistics

           Company" appearing in 3rd line of paragraph No. 6 be corrected to

           Aanchal Chemicals". Further the word "also" appearing in 3rd line of

           paragraph No. 8 be deleted.


           4.      Corrections to the above effect be carried out in the said order

           and corrected order be uploaded. Rest of the said order shall remain

           undisturbed.


           5.      Praecipe is disposed.


Amberkar                                         [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]

                      Digitally signed
                      by RAVINDRA
           RAVINDRA MOHAN
                    AMBERKAR
           MOHAN    Date:
           AMBERKAR 2026.09.08
                      15:01:11
                      +0530




                                                                                   2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.