Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

LAXMAN TUKARAM MOHITEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA.

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court held that the bail application could be withdrawn and therefore dismissed.

Summary

Laxman Tukaram Mohite filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court seeking release from custody in a criminal case instituted by the State of Maharashtra. The applicant was represented by Advocate Mr. Ranjeet M. Pawar, while the respondents were represented by Ms. Anuja S. Gotad and Mr. Krantisinh Gadade (legal aid). The Court heard arguments from both sides and considered whether the applicant was entitled to bail. The learned Judge noted that the applicant was willing to withdraw the bail application and granted him leave to approach the Court again if necessary. Consequently, the Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the bail application. The dismissal leaves the applicant in custody pending further proceedings.

Issues considered

  • Whether the applicant is entitled to bail in the present criminal proceedings

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • High Court
  • application dismissal

Judgment

                                                                                            44.BA.4473.2025.doc

      HARSHADA H. SAWANT
            (P.A.)
                                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                      CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                                  BAIL APPLICATION NO.4473 OF 2025

                    Laxman Tukaram Mohite                            .. Applicant
                               Versus
                    The State of Maharashtra and Anr.                .. Respondents
                                                ....................
                     Mr. Ranjeet M. Pawar, Advocate for Applicant.
                     Ms. Anuja S. Gotad, APP for Respondent No.1.
                     Mr. Krantisinh Gadade, Advocate for Respondent No.2 appointed
                      through legal aid.
                     ASI – N. S. Atole, Walchandnagar Police Station, Pune Rural.
                                                              ...................

                                                             CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                                             DATE          : AUGUST 17, 2026
                    P.C.:

                    1.                 Heard Mr. Pawar, learned Advocate for Applicant; Ms.

                    Gotad, learned APP for Respondent No.1 and Mr. Gadade, learned

                    Advocate for Respondent No.2 appointed through legal aid.


                    2.                 After hearing Mr. Pawar, equally Ms. Gotad and Mr. Gadade

                    and expressing my mind, Mr. Pawar would persuade the Court to allow

                    the Applicant to withdraw the present Application reserving the leave

                    and liberty to approach the Court in accordance with law.


                    3.                 Reserving that leave and liberty, Bail Application is

                    dismissed.



H. H. SAWANT                                                                  [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
                               Digitally signed
                               by HARSHADA
                    HARSHADA   HANUMANT
                    HANUMANT   SAWANT
                    SAWANT     Date:
                               2026.08.17
                               21:25:07 +0530




                                                                                                        1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.