Bombay High Court

PRAVIN RAMESH GHOLAPversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Decided: 28 January 2026
Disposal: Disposed Off
Bench: SHIVKUMAR DIGE

Holding

The Court held that the bail order must be corrected to include the omitted advocate names.

Summary

The High Court of Bombay granted bail to the applicant, Pravin Ramesh Gholap, on 28th January 2026. The order, however, omitted the names of the advocates representing Respondent No.2 in the two bail applications (Harshwardhan Pawar and Shantanu Nakashe). The applicant moved a precipe seeking correction of the minutes to reflect the correct advocate names. The Court examined the omission and found it necessary to amend the order to accurately record the counsel involved. Accordingly, the Court ordered that the names of the advocates be inserted and disposed of the precipe.

Issues considered

Whether the omission of the names of Respondent No.2's advocates in the bail order warrants correction.

Subjects

bail
court order correction
criminal procedure
advocate representation

Judgment

                                                                                   504-BA-4497-25 WITH 4460-25.doc



                             N.S.Kamble


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                        CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                      CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.4497 OF 2025
                                                        WITH
                                      CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.4460 OF 2025


                             Pravin Ramesh Gholap                                      … Applicant

          Digitally signed
                                   Versus
NILAM     by NILAM
          SANTOSH
SANTOSH   KAMBLE
KAMBLE    Date: 2026.02.11
          11:50:45 +0530
                             The State of Maharashtra & Anr.                           … Respondents
                             ________________________________________________________
                             None for the Applicant.
                             Ms.R.D. Humane, APP for Respondent-State.
                             Mr.Harshwardhan Pawar, for Respondent No.2 in BA No.4497 of
                             2025.
                             Mr.Shantanu Nakashe, for Respondent No.2 in BA No.4460 of 2025.
                             ________________________________________________________
                                                             CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                             DATE           : 9th FEBRUARY 2026

                             P.C. :

                             .            Not on board. Taken on board.

                             2.           This preceipe is moved for speaking to the minutes of order

                             dated 28th January 2026, this Court has granted bail to the Applicant.

                             But in the appearance part name of “Advocate Mr.Harshwardhan

                             Pawar, for Respondent No.2 in BA No.4497 of 2025” and “Advocate


                                                              Page 1 of 2
                                                       504-BA-4497-25 WITH 4460-25.doc



N.S.Kamble


Mr.Shantanu Nakashe, for Respondent No.2 in BA No.4460 of 2025”

is not mentioned. It be mentioned

3.           Correction be made accordingly.

4.           Preacipe is disposed of.

                                                 (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)




                                   Page 2 of 2

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…