Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MOHAMMED SALIM ALI HASAN KHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The court granted leave to withdraw the bail application and disposed of it as withdrawn, without hearing it on merits.

Summary

The applicant, Mohammed Salim Ali Hasan Khan, filed a bail application in the Bombay High Court. The prosecution indicated it would examine up to five witnesses and aim to conclude the trial within nine months. The applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the bail application, requesting liberty to refile if the trial exceeded the nine‑month period. The court granted leave to withdraw the application, disposing of it as withdrawn without addressing the merits. The order also clarified that the application was not heard on its substantive issues.

Issues considered

  • Whether the court may permit the withdrawal of a bail application with liberty to reapply if the trial does not conclude within the stipulated nine‑month period

Subjects

  • bail
  • withdrawal of application
  • trial timeline
  • nine months
  • criminal procedure
  • High Court

Judgment

          P.H. Jayani                                                         26 BA457.2026.doc


                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                             CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                               BAIL APPLICATION NO. 457 OF 2026

          Mohammed Salim Ali Hasan Khan                               …. Applicant
                Vs.
          The State of Maharashtra and anr.                           …. Respondents

          Mr. Tohid Shaikh i/b. Ms. Anjali Patil for the Applicant.
          Mr. S.V. Walve, APP for the Respondent – State.
          Adv. Kanchan Pawar i/b. Ms. Vilasini B. for the Respondent No.2.
          Ms. Jayashri R. Anawane, API, Bhiwandi City Police Station, present.

                                            CORAM : SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.
                                            DATED : 12th JUNE, 2026
          P.C. :-

          1)             Mr. Walve, learned APP states that in the case before the trial

          Court, the prosecution will examine maximum 5 witnesses and conclude the

          trial within nine months from today.

          2)             In view thereof, Mr. Shaikh, learned Counsel for the Applicant,

          on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the aforesaid Application with

          liberty to renew his prayer for bail if the prosecution fails to examine the

          witnesses and conclude the trial within nine months, as aforesaid.

          3)             Leave to withdraw, is granted.

          4)             Application stands disposed of as withdrawn, with aforesaid

          liberty.

          5)             It is made clear that this Application is not heard on merits.



                                                        (SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.)
       Digitally
       signed by
       PREETI
PREETI HEERO
HEERO JAYANI
JAYANI Date:
       2026.06.16
       11:57:30
       +0530


                                                                                            1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.