Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PRAMOD KUMAR SITARAM JHAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

Leave to withdraw the bail application was granted and the application was disposed of without being heard on merits.

Summary

Pramod Kumar Sitaram Jha filed a criminal bail application before the Bombay High Court. His counsel, Mr. Heramb Pawar, appeared and sought the court's permission to withdraw the bail application. The Court, after considering the request, granted leave to withdraw. The application was consequently disposed of as withdrawn and the Court expressly noted that it was not heard on its merits. No substantive discussion on bail or the underlying charges was undertaken.

Issues considered

  • Whether a bail application may be withdrawn with the Court's permission
  • Procedural requirements for withdrawing a pending bail application

Subjects

  • bail
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • high court

Judgment

WAKLE
MANOJ
JANARDHAN             Manoj                                                    10-BA-4680-2025.doc
Digitally signed by
WAKLE MANOJ
JANARDHAN
Date: 2026.06.17
20:00:18 +0530                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 4680 OF 2025

                      Pramod Kumar Sitaram Jha                           ...Applicant
                            V/s.
                      The State of Maharashtra & Anr.                    ...Respondents

                      Mr. Heramb Pawar i/by Mr. Arun Gupta, for the Applicant.
                      Ms. S.D. Shinde, APP for the Respondent No.1-State.

                                                      CORAM : SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.

                                                      DATED : 17th JUNE, 2026
                      P.C. :-

                      .            Mr. Pawar, learned Counsel for the Applicant, on instructions,
                      seeks leave to withdraw the aforesaid Application.

                      2)           Leave to withdraw in granted.

                      3)           Application stands disposed of as withdrawn.

                      4)           It is made clear that this Application is not heard on merits.



                                                             (SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.)




                                                                                                     1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.