Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

JITENDRA UTTAM PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The order is corrected to show the correct C.R. No. 252/2022.

Summary

The High Court noted a clerical mistake in the bail application order dated 13 January 2026 where the case reference number was incorrectly recorded as ‘255/2022’ instead of the correct ‘252/2022’. The matter was placed before the court for correction upon request by the Department. The court examined the error and confirmed that it was purely typographical and did not affect the substantive content of the order. Accordingly, the court directed that the order be amended to reflect the correct case reference number. The corrected order is to be uploaded on the Bombay High Court website.

Issues considered

  • Whether a typographical error in the case reference number of a bail order warrants correction

Subjects

  • clerk error
  • order correction
  • bail application

Judgment

                                                                          901- BA 4754 of 2024.doc

                   Tikam


                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                     BAIL APPLICATION NO. 4754 OF 2024

VAISHALI           Jitendra Uttam Patil                                     ...Applicant
ANIL
TIKAM              Versus
                   The State of Maharashtra                                 ...Respondent
Digitally signed
by VAISHALI
ANIL TIKAM
Date:              _________________________________________________________________
2026.02.13
17:17:40 +0530
                   None for the Applicant.
                   M/s. S.G. Talhar, APP for Respondent-State.
                   PSI Ravi Shivaji Jadhav, Bharati Vidhyapeeth P.S. Pune present
                   _________________________________________________________________

                                                        CORAM        :   SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                        DATE         :   13th FEBRUARY, 2026.
                   P.C. :

                   1.         This matter is placed by the Department for speaking to the

                   Minutes of the Order dated 13/01/2026..

                   2.         In Paragraph No.7 and Clause (I), line no.2 of the order the

                   C.R. No. ‘255/2022’ has been erroneously typed instead of ‘252/2022’’ The

                   correct C.R. No. is ‘252/2022’.

                   3.                    The order is corrected accordingly and the corrected

                   order be uploaded on the official website of the Bombay High Court.




                                                                   (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)




                                                     Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.