Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHIVA SITARAM BARDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposal
Withdrawn

Holding

The bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Shiva Sitaram Barde filed a bail application before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The applicant's counsel, Ms. Sonawane Sunita G., sought to withdraw the application and requested that the trial court expedite the pending trial. The bench, disinclined to grant bail, allowed the withdrawal of the application. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty granted to the trial court to conclude the trial expeditiously. The court also quantified fees of the appointed advocate, Mr. Jain Jitendra Shantilal, to be paid by the Legal Services Sub Committee.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the applicant
  • Whether the bail application can be withdrawn at the applicant's request

Subjects

  • bail
  • withdrawal
  • trial expeditious
  • legal services
  • appointed advocate

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:38739
                                                   1                   968-BA.480-26.odt


                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                        BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                  968 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 480 OF 2026
                                        SHIVA SITARAM BARDE
                                               VERSUS
                              THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
                                                     ...
                              Advocate for Applicant : Ms. Sonawane Sunita G.
                               APP for Respondent/State : Mr. S. A. Gaikwad.
                          Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Jain Jitendra Shantilal
                                               (Appointed).
                                                     ...

                                           CORAM       : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.
                                           Dated       : August 25, 2026

                     PER COURT :-


                     1.      After hearing the learned advocate for the Applicant for

                     some time and the learned APP for the State, I have expressed

                     disinclination to allow the application. The learned advocate

                     for the Applicant, on instructions, seeks withdrawal of the

                     application. She also prays that the learned Trial Court be

                     directed to expedite the hearing of the trial. The request for

                     withdrawal is granted.


                     2.      Bail Application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty

                     as prayed for.


                     3.      The learned Trial Court make an endeavor to conclude

                     the trial as expeditiously as possible.
                            2                    968-BA.480-26.odt




4.      Fees of the appointed Advocate Mr. Jain is quantified to

Rs.7,500/- (Rupees Seven Thousand Five Hundred only), to be

paid by the Legal Services Sub Committee, High Court,

Aurangabad.




                                  ( HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. )

                                ...

vmk/-


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.