Bombay High Court
SAGAR DAJI BELUSEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- SHYAM C CHANDAK
Holding
Leave to withdraw the bail application was granted, and the application was disposed of as withdrawn without being heard on merits.
Summary
The applicant, Sagar Daji Beluse, filed a bail application in the High Court of Bombay. The prosecution informed the court that the trial was scheduled to commence that day, with the victim in custody and eight witnesses to be examined, and that the trial would be concluded within one year. On this basis, the applicant's counsel sought leave to withdraw the bail application, requesting liberty to file a fresh bail petition after one year if the trial was not completed within the stipulated period. The Court granted leave to withdraw the application and ordered the bail application to be disposed of as withdrawn. The Court clarified that the application was not heard on its merits.
Issues considered
- Whether a bail application may be withdrawn with liberty to renew after a specified period
- Whether the court can grant such liberty without adjudicating the merits of the bail application
Subjects
- bail
- withdrawal of application
- criminal procedure
- trial timeline
- High Court
Judgment
HEMANT
CHANDERSEN
SHIV
H.C. SHIV 43.ba5439.24.doc
Digitally signed by
HEMANT
CHANDERSEN SHIV
Date: 2026.06.19 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
11:45:19 +0300
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.5439 OF 2024
Sagar Daji Beluse …. Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra …. Respondent
Mr. S. R. Karnik for the Applicant.
Ms. Veera Shinde, APP for the Respondent-State.
Mr. S. K. Ghuge, PSI, V. P. Road, Mumbai present.
CORAM : SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.
DATED : 17th JUNE, 2026
P.C. :-
1) Ms.Shinde, learned APP states that the case before the trial Court is
fixed today and PW.1-victim is in the box. She further states that the
prosecution is going to examine eight witnesses and will conclude the trial
within one year from today.
2) In view of above, Mr. Karnik, learned Counsel for the Applicant, on
instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the Application with liberty to renew
the prayer for bail after one year, if the prosecution fails to complete the trial
within said period.
3) Leave to withdraw is granted.
4) Application stands disposed of as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
5) It is clarified that this Application is not heard on merits.
(SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.)
1/1
Checking your session…